CVE-2025-30223 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.3) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in github.com/beego/beego/v2. A fix is available for github.com/beego/beego/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Beego allows Reflected/Stored XSS in Beego's RenderForm() Function Due to Unescaped User Input
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-30223.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-30223 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/beego/beego/v2🐹github.com/beego/beegoReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Beego's RenderForm() function due to improper HTML escaping of user-controlled data. This vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in victims' browsers, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or account takeover. The vulnerability affects any application using Beego's RenderForm() function with user-provided data. Since it is a high-level function generating an entire form markup, many developers would assume it automatically escapes attributes (the way most frameworks do).
Details
The vulnerability is located in the renderFormField() function in Beego's templatefunc.go file (around lines 316-356). This function directly injects user-provided values into HTML without proper escaping:
return fmt.Sprintf(`%v<input%v%v name="%v" type="%v" value="%v"%v>`,
label, id, class, name, fType, value, requiredString)
None of the values (label, id, class, name, value) are properly HTML-escaped before being inserted into the HTML template. This allows attackers to break out of the attribute context or inject HTML tags directly. The vulnerability can be exploited in two main ways:
- Attribute Injection: By injecting code into fields like DisplayName, an attacker can break out of the attribute context and execute JavaScript.
- Content Injection: By injecting HTML tags into textarea content, an attacker can execute JavaScript.
The RenderForm() function returns template.HTML, which bypasses Go's automatic HTML escaping, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous.
PoC
Retrieve the following (secret) gist: https://gist.github.com/thevilledev/8fd0cab3f098320aa9daab04be59fd2b
To run it:
go mod init beego-xss-poc
go mod tidy
go run poc.go
Open your browser and navigate to http://localhost:8080/
The application demonstrates the vulnerability through several examples:
/profile- Shows a profile with malicious data in the Display Name and Bio fields/admin- Shows multiple user profiles, including one with malicious data/submit- Allows you to create your own profile with malicious data
In addition, you may use this Go test in templatefunc_test.go. The test passes, validating the vulnerability.
func TestRenderFormXSSVulnerability(t *testing.T) {
type UserProfile struct {
DisplayName string `form:"displayName,text,Name:"`
Bio string `form:",textarea"`
}
// Test case 1: Attribute injection in input field
maliciousUser := UserProfile{
DisplayName: `" onmouseover="alert('XSS')" data-malicious="`,
Bio: "Normal bio text",
}
output := RenderForm(&maliciousUser)
// The vulnerable output would contain the unescaped JavaScript
if !strings.Contains(string(output), `onmouseover="alert('XSS')"`) {
t.Errorf("Expected XSS vulnerability in attribute, but got safe output: %v", output)
}
// Test case 2: Script injection in textarea
maliciousUser2 := UserProfile{
DisplayName: "Normal Name",
Bio: `</textarea><script>alert('XSS')</script><textarea>`,
}
output = RenderForm(&maliciousUser2)
// The vulnerable output would contain the unescaped script tag
if !strings.Contains(string(output), `</textarea><script>alert('XSS')`) {
t.Errorf("Expected XSS vulnerability in textarea content, but got safe output: %v", output)
}
}
Impact
This is a high-severity vulnerability with the following impacts:
- Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Allows execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim's browser.
- Session Hijacking: Attackers can steal session cookies and impersonate victims.
- Credential Theft: Attackers can create fake login forms to steal credentials.
- Account Takeover: Attackers can perform actions on behalf of the victim.
- Data Exfiltration: Sensitive data visible in the browser can be stolen.
This is particularly concerning in admin panels or user management interfaces where one user's data is displayed to another user (typically an administrator).
Mitigation
The vulnerability can be fixed by properly escaping all user-provided values before inserting them into HTML, for example:
// Convert value to string and escape it
valueStr := ""
if value != nil {
valueStr = template.HTMLEscapeString(fmt.Sprintf("%v", value))
}
// Escape the name and label
escapedName := template.HTMLEscapeString(name)
escapedLabel := template.HTMLEscapeString(label)
escapedType := template.HTMLEscapeString(fType)
return fmt.Sprintf(`%v<input%v%v name="%v" type="%v" value="%v"%v>`,
escapedLabel, id, class, escapedName, escapedType, valueStr, requiredString)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/beego/beego/v2 | all versions | 2.3.6go get github.com/beego/beego/v2@v2.3.6 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/beego/beego | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/beego/beego/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/beego/beego/v2 to 2.3.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-30223 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-30223 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-30223. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-30223 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-30223 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.