CVE-2025-27098 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) Path Traversal vulnerability in @graphql-mesh/cli. A fix is available for @graphql-mesh/cli — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Unwanted access to the entire file system vulnerability due to a missing check in `staticFiles` HTTP handler in graphql-mesh
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-27098.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-27098 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
@graphql-mesh/cli📦@graphql-mesh/httpReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Missing check vulnerability in the static file handler allows any client to access the files in the server's file system
Details
When staticFiles is set in the serve settings in the configuration file, the following handler doesn't check if absolutePath is still under the directory provided as staticFiles;
if (staticFiles) {
router.get('/:relativePath+', async request => {
let { relativePath } = request.params;
if (!relativePath) {
relativePath = 'index.html';
}
const absolutePath = path.join(baseDir, staticFiles, relativePath);
if (absolutePath.includes(staticFiles) && (await pathExists(absolutePath))) {
const readStream = fs.createReadStream(absolutePath);
return new Response(readStream as any, {
status: 200,
});
}
return undefined;
});
Example scenario
To reproduce it, set staticFiles to the relative path of a directory in .meshrc.yml;
serve:
staticFiles: ./public
Then start the server with mesh dev, and browse to /..%2fpackage.json then you will see the content of package.json. You can even go deeper to see sensitive data; /..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2fetc/passwd
Impact and solution
If staticFiles is set under serve in the configuration file. you have two options to fix vulnerability;
- Update
@graphql-mesh/clito a version higher than0.82.21, and if you use@graphql-mesh/http, update it to a version higher than0.3.18 - Remove
staticFilesoption from the configuration, and use other solutions to serve static files.
Credits
Thanks [email protected] for reporting this vulnerability with details
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @graphql-mesh/cli | ≥ 0.78.0&&< 0.82.22 | 0.82.22npm install @graphql-mesh/cli@0.82.22 |
| 📦npm | @graphql-mesh/http | all versions | 0.3.19npm install @graphql-mesh/http@0.3.19 |
Affected Products
graphql mesh clithe-guildgraphql mesh httpthe-guildDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @graphql-mesh/cli, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @graphql-mesh/cli to 0.82.22 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-27098 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-27098 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.