NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2024-35189 — ethyca-fides

MEDIUM

CVE-2024-35189 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Information Exposure vulnerability in ethyca-fides. A fix is available for ethyca-fides — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Sensitive Data Disclosure Vulnerability in Connection Configuration Endpoints in Fides

Also known asGHSA-rcvg-jj3g-rj7cPYSEC-2026-1346
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 3, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-35189.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs48th percentile — riskier than 48% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.36%0.72%1.08%0.3%0.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍ethyca-fides

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

The Fides webserver has a number of endpoints that retrieve ConnectionConfiguration records and their associated secrets which can contain sensitive data (e.g. passwords, private keys, etc.). These secrets are stored encrypted at rest (in the application database), and the associated endpoints are not meant to expose that sensitive data in plaintext to API clients, as it could be compromising.

Fides's developers have available to them a Pydantic field-attribute (sensitive) that they can annotate as True to indicate that a given secret field should not be exposed via the API. The application has an internal function that uses sensitive annotations to mask the sensitive fields with a "**********" placeholder value.

This vulnerability is due to a bug in that function, which prevented sensitive API model fields that were nested below the root-level of a secrets object from being masked appropriately. Only the BigQuery connection configuration secrets meets these criteria: the secrets schema has a nested sensitive keyfile_creds.private_key property that is exposed in plaintext via the APIs.

Connection types other than BigQuery with sensitive fields at the root-level that are not nested are properly masked with the placeholder and are not affected by this vulnerability.

Impact

The Google Cloud secrets used for a Fides BigQuery integration may be retrieved in plaintext by any authenticated Admin UI user, except those with the Approver role. Any API users authorized to access the following endpoints may also retrieve the key in plaintext.

Endpoints impacted:

  • GET /api/v1/connections
  • PATCH /api/v1/connections
  • GET /api/v1/connection/{connection_key}
  • PATCH /api/v1/system/{system_key}/connection
  • GET /api/v1/system/{system_key}
  • GET /api/v1/system/{system_key}/connection

Connection config secret schemas impacted:

  • BigQuerySchema

Patches

The vulnerability has been patched in Fides version 2.37.0. Users are advised to upgrade to this version or later to secure their systems against this threat.

Users are also advised to rotate any Google Cloud secrets used for BigQuery integrations in their Fides deployments: https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/key-rotation

Workarounds

There are no workarounds.

Proof of concept

Multiple endpoints are impacted, but this PoC will use GET /api/v1/system/{system_key} as an example.

  1. Using the Admin UI, navigate to /add-systems. Add and save a new system bq_poc.
  2. In the integrations tab of the new system, configure and save a BigQuery integration with secrets.
  3. Log in as a different user with any role except Approver and navigate to the /systems page.
  4. Open the network section of your browser's developer tools.
  5. Click on the bq_poc system's meatball menu and then click edit.
  6. In the network section of browser dev tools you will observe a HTTP GET http://localhost:8080/api/v1/system/bq_poc/ request. In the body of the JSON response the integration secrets values entered in Step 2 are exposed in plaintext i.e.
{
  "secrets": {
    "keyfile_creds": {
      "type": "value",
      "project_id": "value",
      "private_key_id": "value",
      "private_key": "value",
      "client_email": "value",
      "client_id": "value",
      "auth_uri": "value",
      "token_uri": "value",
      "auth_provider_x509_cert_url": "value",
      "client_x509_cert_url": "value"
    }
  }
}

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIethyca-fidesall versions2.37.0pip install --upgrade 'ethyca-fides==2.37.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
fidesethyca
< 2.37.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ethyca-fides, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ethyca-fides to 2.37.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-35189 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Fides webserver has a number of endpoints that retrieve `ConnectionConfiguration` records and their associated `secrets` which _can_ contain sensitive data (e.g. passwords, private keys, etc.). These `secrets` are stored encrypted at rest (in the application database), and the associated endpoints are not meant to expose that sensitive data in plaintext to API clients, as it could be compromising. Fides's developers have available to them a Pydantic field-attribute (`sensitive`) that they can annotate as `True` to indicate that a given secret field should not be exposed via the API. The
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2024-35189 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2024-35189: ethyca-fides — Fixed in 2.37.0