NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm💎 RubyGems
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2024-28121 — stimulus_reflex

HIGHFix: stimulusreflex/stimulus_reflex@538582d

CVE-2024-28121 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) CWE-470 vulnerability in stimulus_reflex. A fix is available for stimulus_reflex — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Reflex arbitrary method call in stimulus_reflex

Also known asGHSA-f78j-4w3g-4q65
Published
Updated
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
4 / 4
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-28121.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs75th percentile — riskier than 75% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.95%1.32%1.69%2.05%1.5%1.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

4 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

1other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
stimulus_reflexnpm
7Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

More methods than expected can be called on reflex instances. Being able to call some of them has security implications.

Details

To invoke a reflex a websocket message of the following shape is sent:

{ 
  "target": "[class_name]#[method_name]", 
  "args": [] 
}

The server will proceed to instantiate reflex using the provided class_name as long as it extends StimulusReflex::Reflex. It then attempts to call method_name on the instance with the provided arguments ref:

method = reflex.method method_name
required_params = method.parameters.select { |(kind, _)| kind == :req }
optional_params = method.parameters.select { |(kind, _)| kind == :opt }

if arguments.size >= required_params.size && arguments.size <= required_params.size + optional_params.size
  reflex.public_send(method_name, *arguments)
end

This is problematic as reflex.method(method_name) can be more methods than those explicitly specified by the developer in their reflex class. A good example is the instance_variable_set method.

<details> <summary>Read more</summary> Let's imagine a reflex that uses `@user` as a trusted variable in an `after_reflex` callback.

This variable can be overwritten using the following message:

{
  "target": "ChatReflex#instance_variable_set", 
  "args": ["@user", "<admin-id>"]
}

Here are other interesting methods that were found to be available for the ChatReflex sample reflex

  • remote_byebug: bind a debugging server
  • pry: drop the process in a REPL session

All in all, only counting :req and :opt parameters helps. For example around version 1.0 only .arity was checked which allowed access to the system method (.arity == -1)

{
  "target": "ChatReflex#system", 
  "args": ["[command here]"]
}

Using public_send instead of send does not help but the following payloads do not work since :rest parameters are not counted in the current version

{
  "target": "ChatReflex#send", 
  "args": ["system", "[command here]"] 
}
{ 
  "target": "ChatReflex#instance_eval", 
  "args": ["system('[command here]')"]
}
</details>

Pre-versions of 3.5.0 added a render_collection method on reflexes with a :req parameter. Calling this method could lead to arbitrary code execution:

{
  "target": "StimulusReflex::Reflex#render_collection", 
  "args": [
    { "inline":  "<% system('[command here]') %>" }
  ]
}

Patches

Patches are available on RubyGems and on NPM.

The patched versions are:

Workaround

You can add this guard to mitigate the issue if running an unpatched version of the library.

1.) Make sure all your reflexes inherit from the ApplicationReflex class 2.) Add this before_reflex callback to your app/reflexes/application_reflex.rb file:

class ApplicationReflex < StimulusReflex::Reflex
  before_reflex do
    ancestors = self.class.ancestors[0..self.class.ancestors.index(StimulusReflex::Reflex) - 1]
    allowed = ancestors.any? { |a| a.public_instance_methods(false).any?(method_name.to_sym) }

    raise ArgumentError.new("Reflex method '#{method_name}' is not defined on class '#{self.class.name}' or on any of its ancestors") if !allowed
  end
end

Affected Packages

4 total 4 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmstimulus_reflex≥ 3.5.0-pre0&&< 3.5.0-rc43.5.0-rc4npm install stimulus_reflex@3.5.0-rc4
📦npmstimulus_reflexall versions3.4.2npm install stimulus_reflex@3.4.2
💎RubyGemsstimulus_reflex≥ 3.5.0.pre0&&< 3.5.0.rc43.5.0.rc4bundle update stimulus_reflex --conservative
💎RubyGemsstimulus_reflexall versions3.4.2bundle update stimulus_reflex --conservative

Affected Products

1 product · 14 configurations
Application
stimulusrelfexstimulusreflex
< 3.4.2
1 version
3.5.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for stimulus_reflex, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update stimulus_reflex to 3.5.0-rc4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-28121 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary More methods than expected can be called on reflex instances. Being able to call some of them has security implications. ### Details To invoke a reflex a websocket message of the following shape is sent: ```json { "target": "[class_name]#[method_name]", "args": [] } ``` The server will proceed to instantiate `reflex` using the provided `class_name` as long as it extends `StimulusReflex::Reflex`. It then attempts to call `method_name` on the instance with the provided arguments [ref](https://github.com/stimulusreflex/stimulus_reflex/blob/0211cad7d60fe96838587f159d657e44cee51
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2024-28121 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2024-28121: stimulus_reflex RCE — Fixed in 3.5.0-rc4