CVE-2024-1143 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.3) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server. A fix is available for com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Central Dogma Authentication Bypass Vulnerability via Session Leakage
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-1143.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2024-1143 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-serverReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Vulnerability Overview
A vulnerability has been identified in Central Dogma versions prior to 0.64.1, allowing for the leakage of user sessions and subsequent authentication bypass. The issue stems from a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack vector that targets the RelayState of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML).
Impact
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability enables malicious actors to leak user sessions, leading to the compromise of authentication mechanisms. This, in turn, can facilitate unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
Patches
This vulnerability is addressed and resolved in Central Dogma version 0.64.1 Users are strongly encouraged to upgrade to this version or later to mitigate the risk associated with the authentication bypass.
Workarounds
No viable workarounds are currently available for this vulnerability. It is recommended to apply the provided patch promptly.
References
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server | all versions | 0.64.1com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server:0.64.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server to 0.64.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-1143 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2024-1143 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2024-1143. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2024-1143 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2024-1143 across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.