NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2023-43645 — openfga

MEDIUMFix: openfga/openfga@7252960

CVE-2023-43645 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-835 vulnerability in github.com/openfga/openfga. A fix is available for github.com/openfga/openfga — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Denial of service from circular relationship definitions in OpenFGA

Also known asGHSA-2hm9-h873-pgqhGO-2023-2084
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 4, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-43645.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.9%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs61th percentile — riskier than 61% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.48%0.96%1.44%0.3%0.9%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/openfga/openfga

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Overview

OpenFGA is vulnerable to a DoS attack when certain Check calls are executed against authorization models that contain circular relationship definitions. When the call is made, it's possible for the server to exhaust resources and die.

Am I Affected?

Yes, if your store contains an authorization model that allows circular relationships. For example, with this model:

model
  schema 1.1

type user

type group
  relations
    define memberA: [user] or memberB or memberC or memberD or memberE
    define memberB: [user] or memberA or memberC or memberD or memberE
    define memberC: [user] or memberA or memberB or memberD or memberE
    define memberD: [user] or memberA or memberB or memberC or memberE
    define memberE: [user] or memberA or memberB or memberC or memberD

This Check: (user:anne, memberA, group:X) can exhaust memory in the server.

Fix

Upgrade to v1.3.2 and update any offending models.

[BREAKING] If your model contained cycles or a relation definition that has the relation itself in its evaluation path, then Checks and queries that require evaluation will no longer be evaluated on v1.3.2+ and will return errors instead. You will need to update your models to remove the cycles.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/openfga/openfgaall versions1.3.2go get github.com/openfga/openfga@v1.3.2

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
openfgaopenfga
< 1.3.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/openfga/openfga, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/openfga/openfga to 1.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-43645 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Overview OpenFGA is vulnerable to a DoS attack when certain Check calls are executed against authorization models that contain circular relationship definitions. When the call is made, it's possible for the server to exhaust resources and die. ## Am I Affected? Yes, if your store contains an authorization model that allows circular relationships. For example, with this model: ``` model schema 1.1 type user type group relations define memberA: [user] or memberB or memberC or memberD or memberE define memberB: [user] or memberA or memberC or memberD or memberE define membe
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2023-43645 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2023-43645: openfga DoS — Fixed in 1.3.2