NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2023-30620 — mindsdb

HIGHFix: mindsdb/mindsdb@4419b0f

CVE-2023-30620 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in mindsdb. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for mindsdb — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Arbitrary File Write when Extracting a Remotely retrieved Tarball in mindsdb/mindsdb

Also known asGHSA-2g5w-29q9-w6hxPYSEC-2023-27
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-30620.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs63th percentile — riskier than 63% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.15%0.66%1.17%1.68%1.2%1.0%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍mindsdb

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

An unsafe extraction is being performed using tarfile.extractall() from a remotely retrieved tarball. Which may lead to the writing of the extracted files to an unintended location. Sometimes, the vulnerability is called a TarSlip or a ZipSlip variant.

Details

I commented the following snippet of code as a vulnerability details. The code is from file.py#L26..L134

@ns_conf.route('/<name>')
@ns_conf.param('name', "MindsDB's name for file")
class File(Resource):
    @ns_conf.doc('put_file')
    def put(self, name: str):
        ''' add new file
            params in FormData:
                - file
                - original_file_name [optional]
        '''

        data = {}

        ... omitted for brevity

            url = data['source']
            data['file'] = data['name']

            ... omitted for brevity 

            with requests.get(url, stream=True) as r:                   # Source: retrieve the URL which point to a remotely located tarball 
                if r.status_code != 200:
                    return http_error(
                        400,
                        "Error getting file",
                        f"Got status code: {r.status_code}"
                    )
                file_path = os.path.join(temp_dir_path, data['file'])
                with open(file_path, 'wb') as f:
                    for chunk in r.iter_content(chunk_size=8192):   # write with chunks the remote retrieved file into file_path location 
                        f.write(chunk)

        original_file_name = data.get('original_file_name')

        file_path = os.path.join(temp_dir_path, data['file'])      
        lp = file_path.lower()
        if lp.endswith(('.zip', '.tar.gz')):
            if lp.endswith('.zip'):
                with zipfile.ZipFile(file_path) as f:
                    f.extractall(temp_dir_path)
            elif lp.endswith('.tar.gz'):
                with tarfile.open(file_path) as f:  # Just after 
                    f.extractall(temp_dir_path)  # Sink: the tarball located by file_path is supposed to be extracted to temp_dir_path. 

So, a remotely available tarball is being retrieved and written to the server filesystem in chunks, and then, if the extension ends with .tar.gz of a compressed tarball, the mindsdb app applies tarfile.extractall() directly with no checks for the destination.

However, according to the following warning from the official documentation;

Warning: Never extract archives from untrusted sources without prior inspection. It is possible that files are created outside of path, e.g. members that have absolute filenames starting with "/" or filenames with two dots "..".

PoC

The following PoC is provided for illustration purposes only. It showcases the risk of extracting a non-harmless text file sim4n6.txt to one of the parent locations rather than the intended current folder.

> tar --list -v -f archive.tar.gz
tar: Removing leading "../../../" from member names
../../../sim4n6.txt

> python3 
Python 3.10.6 (main, Nov  2 2022, 18:53:38) [GCC 11.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import tarfile
>>> with tarfile.open("archive.tar.gz") as tf:
>>>         tf.extractall()
>>> exit()

> test -f ../../../sim4n6.txt && echo "sim4n6.txt exists"
sim4n6.txt exists

Attack Scenario

An attacker could craft a malicious tarball with a filename path, such as ../../../../../../../../etc/passwd, and then serve the archive remotely, proceed to the PUT request of the tarball through mindsdb and overwrite the system files of the hosting server for instance.

Mitigation

Potential mitigation could be to:

  • Use a safer module, like zipfile.
  • Use an alternative of tarfile, such as tarsafe.
  • Validate the location or the absolute path of the extracted files and discard those with malicious paths such as relative path ../../.. or absolute path such as /etc/password. A simple wrapper could be written to raise an exception when a path traversal may be identified.

This is similar to the other report GHSA-7x45-phmr-9wqp.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImindsdball versions23.2.1.0pip install --upgrade 'mindsdb==23.2.1.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
mindsdbmindsdb
≤ 23.1.5.0
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mindsdb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update mindsdb to 23.2.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-30620 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary An unsafe extraction is being performed using `tarfile.extractall()` from a remotely retrieved tarball. Which may lead to the writing of the extracted files to an unintended location. Sometimes, the vulnerability is called a TarSlip or a ZipSlip variant. ### Details I commented the following snippet of code as a vulnerability details. The code is from [file.py#L26..L134](https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/blob/afedd37c16e579b6dc075b0814e42d0505ccdc07/mindsdb/api/http/namespaces/file.py#L26..L134) ```python @ns_conf.route('/<name>') @ns_conf.param('name', "MindsDB's name for fil
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2023-30620 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2023-30620: mindsdb — Fixed in 23.2.1.0