NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2022-24766 — mitmproxy

CRITICALFix: mitmproxy/mitmproxy@b06fb6d

CVE-2022-24766 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-444 vulnerability in mitmproxy. A fix is available for mitmproxy — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Insufficient Protection against HTTP Request Smuggling in mitmproxy

Also known asGHSA-gcx2-gvj7-pxv3PYSEC-2022-170
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2022-24766.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs76th percentile — riskier than 76% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.29%0.91%1.53%2.15%0.8%1.6%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍mitmproxy

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

In mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below, a malicious client or server is able to perform HTTP request smuggling attacks through mitmproxy. This means that a malicious client/server could smuggle a request/response through mitmproxy as part of another request/response's HTTP message body. While mitmproxy would only see one request, the target server would see multiple requests. A smuggled request is still captured as part of another request's body, but it does not appear in the request list and does not go through the usual mitmproxy event hooks, where users may have implemented custom access control checks or input sanitization.

Unless you use mitmproxy to protect an HTTP/1 service, no action is required.

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed in mitmproxy 8.0.0 and above.

Acknowledgements

We thank Zeyu Zhang (@zeyu2001) for responsibly disclosing this vulnerability to the mitmproxy team.

Timeline

  • 2022-03-15: Received initial report.
  • 2022-03-15: Verified report and confirmed receipt.
  • 2022-03-16: Shared patch with researcher.
  • 2022-03-16: Received confirmation that patch is working.
  • 2022-03-19: Published patched release and advisory.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImitmproxyall versions8.0.0pip install --upgrade 'mitmproxy==8.0.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
mitmproxymitmproxy
≤ 7.0.4
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mitmproxy, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update mitmproxy to 8.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2022-24766 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact In mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below, a malicious client or server is able to perform [HTTP request smuggling](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_request_smuggling) attacks through mitmproxy. This means that a malicious client/server could smuggle a request/response through mitmproxy as part of another request/response's HTTP message body. While mitmproxy would only see one request, the target server would see multiple requests. A smuggled request is still captured as part of another request's body, but it does not appear in the request list and does not go through the usual mitmproxy even
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2022-24766 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2022-24766: mitmproxy — Fixed in 8.0.0