Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2012-0051 tahoe-lafs

CVE-2012-0051 is a security vulnerability in tahoe-lafs. 2 public exploit references exist, so weaponization risk is real. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

Tahoe-LAFS fails to ensure integrity

Published
Apr 23, 2022
Updated
Nov 22, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
2 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs77th percentile — riskier than 77% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍tahoe-lafs

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.0 fails to ensure integrity which allows remote attackers to corrupt mutable files or directories upon retrieval.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItahoe-lafsall versionsNo fix
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tahoe-lafs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of tahoe-lafs has shipped for CVE-2012-0051 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2012-0051 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2012-0051. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.0 fails to ensure integrity which allows remote attackers to corrupt mutable files or directories upon retrieval.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2012-0051 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2012-0051 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2012-0051: tahoe-lafs | O3 Security