Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-xm67-587q-r2vw

LOW

wasmtime vulnerable to miscompilation of `i8x16.select` with the same inputs on x86_64

Also known asCVE-2023-27477RUSTSEC-2023-0093
Published
Mar 9, 2023
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
6 pkgs
Patched
6 / 6
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk45th percentile+0.15%
0.00%0.37%0.75%1.12%0.3%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

6 pkgs affected
🦀wasmtime🦀wasmtime🦀wasmtime🦀cranelift-codegen🦀cranelift-codegen🦀cranelift-codegen

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Wasmtime's code generation backend, Cranelift, has a bug on x86_64 platforms for the WebAssembly i8x16.select instruction which will produce the wrong results when the same operand is provided to the instruction and some of the selected indices are greater than 16. There is an off-by-one error in the calculation of the mask to the pshufb instruction which causes incorrect results to be returned if lanes are selected from the second vector.

The impact of this miscompilation is that the WebAssembly instruction can produce incorrect results for the i8x16.select instruction. This should have no effect on embedders and does not represent a sandbox escape, for example. Guest programs, however, may behave unexpectedly due to the incorrect result of this instruction. In extreme cases if a guest program is handling untrusted input then the guest program may deviate from its intended execution, for example calling an imported host function with different arguments than intended. This still does not impact embedders, however, because there is no form of privilege escalation with the guest.

At this time it's expected that this codegen pattern doesn't show up in the wild that often. LLVM-generated modules, for example, do not appear to conventionally or idiomatically generate code which would hit this bug. It is possible, however, to still write code which triggers this, so it's recommended for embedders to analyze existing modules to see if any are affected.

Patches

This codegen bug has been fixed in Wasmtime 6.0.1, 5.0.1, and 4.0.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to these updated versions.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not an option for you at this time, you can avoid this miscompilation by disabling the Wasm simd proposal

config.wasm_simd(false);

Additionally the bug is only present on x86_64 hosts. Other platforms such as AArch64 and s390x are not affected.

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

6 total 6 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iowasmtime1.0.0&&< 4.0.14.0.1
🦀crates.iowasmtime5.0.0&&< 5.0.15.0.1
🦀crates.iowasmtime6.0.0&&< 6.0.16.0.1
🦀crates.iocranelift-codegen0.88.0&&< 0.91.10.91.1
🦀crates.iocranelift-codegen0.92.0&&< 0.92.10.92.1
🦀crates.iocranelift-codegen0.93.0&&< 0.93.10.93.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for wasmtime. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update wasmtime to 4.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xm67-587q-r2vw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-xm67-587q-r2vw is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-xm67-587q-r2vw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Wasmtime's code generation backend, Cranelift, has a bug on x86_64 platforms for the WebAssembly `i8x16.select` instruction which will produce the wrong results when the same operand is provided to the instruction and some of the selected indices are greater than 16. There is an off-by-one error in the calculation of the mask to the `pshufb` instruction which causes incorrect results to be returned if lanes are selected from the second vector. The impact of this miscompilation is that the WebAssembly instruction can produce incorrect results for the `i8x16.select` instruction. Th
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xm67-587q-r2vw in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-xm67-587q-r2vw across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.