Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34 actix-http

GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34 is a CWE-444 vulnerability in actix-http. A fix is available for actix-http — see the affected versions and patch details below.

actix-http has HTTP/1.1 CL.TE Request Smuggling

Also known asCVE-2026-73051
Published
Apr 22, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs27th percentile — riskier than 27% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀actix-http

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A vulnerability in actix-http's HTTP/1.1 request parser allows an unauthenticated remote client to smuggle requests in deployments where a front-end HTTP intermediary and the Actix backend disagree about whether Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding: chunked defines the request body length.

Severity

Medium. This is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability that can be triggered over the network without application-level credentials. Exploitation requires a specific proxy topology: an upstream proxy, WAF, load balancer, or similar intermediary must use Content-Length framing while forwarding the conflicting Transfer-Encoding: chunked request to an Actix backend over a reused HTTP/1.1 connection.

Affected Versions

  • actix-http: versions up to and including 3.12.0

Description

HTTP/1.1 requests that contain both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: chunked are ambiguous and must be rejected by recipients to avoid request smuggling.

Affected versions of actix-http accepted a request with a syntactically valid Content-Length header and Transfer-Encoding: chunked on the same HTTP/1.1 message. The parser then selected chunked decoding instead of rejecting the conflicting framing signals.

In a CL.TE proxy topology, an intermediary may treat bytes after the declared Content-Length body as part of the first request, while the Actix backend stops at the terminating chunk marker and parses the remaining bytes on the backend connection as a second HTTP request. This creates a backend-side request desynchronization primitive.

The issue is limited to HTTP/1.1 request parsing.

Impact

HTTP request smuggling

  • Attack Vector: Network, unauthenticated.
  • Effect: Backend request desynchronization with low integrity impact to requests processed by the vulnerable Actix service.
  • Scope: Actix services using affected actix-http versions behind an HTTP/1.1 intermediary that forwards ambiguous Content-Length plus Transfer-Encoding: chunked requests and reuses backend connections.

No direct confidentiality, availability, or subsequent-system impact is scored for this advisory.

Fixed Versions

This issue is fixed in actix-http 3.12.1.

The fix rejects HTTP/1.1 requests that contain both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding: chunked instead of choosing one framing interpretation.

Mitigation

Users should upgrade to actix-http 3.12.1 or later.

Applications that depend on actix-http through actix-web, awc, or another Actix crate should ensure dependency resolution selects actix-http 3.12.1 or later. For example:

cargo update -p actix-http

If an immediate upgrade is not possible, configure all upstream HTTP intermediaries to reject HTTP/1.1 requests that contain both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding, and avoid forwarding ambiguous request framing to Actix backends.

Credits

Actix thanks mufeedvh who disclosed this issue through coordinated disclosure.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.ioactix-httpall versions3.12.1cargo update -p actix-http --precise 3.12.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for actix-http, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update actix-http to 3.12.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

A vulnerability in `actix-http`'s HTTP/1.1 request parser allows an unauthenticated remote client to smuggle requests in deployments where a front-end HTTP intermediary and the Actix backend disagree about whether `Content-Length` or `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` defines the request body length. ## Severity **Medium**. This is an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability that can be triggered over the network without application-level credentials. Exploitation requires a specific proxy topology: an upstream proxy, WAF, load balancer, or similar intermediary must use `Content-Length` framing while
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-xhj4-vrgc-hr34: actix-http | O3 Security