Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m — openclaw

HIGHFix: openclaw/openclaw#16285

GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenClaw has two SSRF via sendMediaFeishu and markdown image fetching in Feishu extension

Also known asCVE-2026-28451
Published
Feb 18, 2026
Updated
Mar 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs20th percentile — riskier than 20% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
openclawnpm
2.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The Feishu extension could fetch attacker-controlled remote URLs in two paths without SSRF protections:

  • sendMediaFeishu(mediaUrl)
  • Feishu DocX markdown image URLs (write/append -> image processing)

Affected versions

  • < 2026.2.14

Patched versions

  • >= 2026.2.14

Impact

If an attacker can influence tool calls (directly or via prompt injection), they may be able to trigger requests to internal services and re-upload the response as Feishu media.

Remediation

Upgrade to OpenClaw 2026.2.14 or newer.

Notes

The fix routes Feishu remote media fetching through hardened runtime helpers that enforce SSRF policies and size limits.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopenclawall versions2026.2.14npm install openclaw@2026.2.14

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update openclaw to 2026.2.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The Feishu extension could fetch attacker-controlled remote URLs in two paths without SSRF protections: - `sendMediaFeishu(mediaUrl)` - Feishu DocX markdown image URLs (write/append -> image processing) ### Affected versions - `< 2026.2.14` ### Patched versions - `>= 2026.2.14` ### Impact If an attacker can influence tool calls (directly or via prompt injection), they may be able to trigger requests to internal services and re-upload the response as Feishu media. ### Remediation Upgrade to OpenClaw `2026.2.14` or newer. ### Notes The fix routes Feishu remote media fetching th
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-x22m-j5qq-j49m: openclaw (High 8.6) | O3 Security