Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-wwjw-r3gj-39fq

MEDIUM

Insufficient Session Expiration in TYPO3's Admin Tool

Also known asBIT-typo3-2022-31050CVE-2022-31050
Published
Jun 17, 2022
Updated
Dec 6, 2023
Affected
5 pkgs
Patched
5 / 5
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk63th percentile+0.72%
0.00%0.55%1.10%1.66%0.4%1.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

5 pkgs affected
🐘typo3/cms-core🐘typo3/cms-core🐘typo3/cms-core🐘typo3/cms🐘typo3/cms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Meta

  • CVSS: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L/E:F/RL:O/RC:C (5.6)

Problem

Admin Tool sessions initiated via the TYPO3 backend user interface have not been revoked even if the corresponding user account was degraded to lower permissions or disabled completely. This way, sessions in the admin tool theoretically could have been prolonged without any limit.

Solution

Update to TYPO3 versions 9.5.35 ELTS, 10.4.29, 11.5.11 that fix the problem described above.

Credits

Thanks to Kien Hoang who reported this issue and to TYPO3 framework merger Ralf Zimmermann and TYPO3 security member Oliver Hader who fixed the issue.

References

Affected Packages

5 total 5 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagisttypo3/cms-core9.0.0&&< 9.5.359.5.35
🐘Packagisttypo3/cms-core10.0.0&&< 10.4.2910.4.29
🐘Packagisttypo3/cms-core11.0.0&&< 11.5.1111.5.11
🐘Packagisttypo3/cms10.0.0&&< 10.4.2910.4.29
🐘Packagisttypo3/cms11.0.0&&< 11.5.1111.5.11

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for typo3/cms-core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update typo3/cms-core to 9.5.35 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-wwjw-r3gj-39fq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-wwjw-r3gj-39fq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-wwjw-r3gj-39fq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

> ### Meta > * CVSS: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L/E:F/RL:O/RC:C` (5.6) ### Problem Admin Tool sessions initiated via the TYPO3 backend user interface have not been revoked even if the corresponding user account was degraded to lower permissions or disabled completely. This way, sessions in the admin tool theoretically could have been prolonged without any limit. ### Solution Update to TYPO3 versions 9.5.35 ELTS, 10.4.29, 11.5.11 that fix the problem described above. ### Credits Thanks to Kien Hoang who reported this issue and to TYPO3 framework merger Ralf Zimmermann and TY
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-wwjw-r3gj-39fq in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-wwjw-r3gj-39fq across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.