GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw is a critical-severity (CVSS 10) SQL Injection vulnerability in sequelize. 2 public exploit references exist, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for sequelize — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Sequelize vulnerable to SQL Injection via replacements
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
sequelizenpmDescription
Impact
The SQL injection exploit is related to replacements. Here is such an example:
In the following query, some parameters are passed through replacements, and some are passed directly through the where option.
User.findAll({
where: or(
literal('soundex("firstName") = soundex(:firstName)'),
{ lastName: lastName },
),
replacements: { firstName },
})
This is a very legitimate use case, but this query was vulnerable to SQL injection due to how Sequelize processed the query: Sequelize built a first query using the where option, then passed it over to sequelize.query which parsed the resulting SQL to inject all :replacements.
If the user passed values such as
{
"firstName": "OR true; DROP TABLE users;",
"lastName": ":firstName"
}
Sequelize would first generate this query:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE soundex("firstName") = soundex(:firstName) OR "lastName" = ':firstName'
Then would inject replacements in it, which resulted in this:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE soundex("firstName") = soundex('OR true; DROP TABLE users;') OR "lastName" = ''OR true; DROP TABLE users;''
As you can see this resulted in arbitrary user-provided SQL being executed.
Patches
The issue was fixed in Sequelize 6.19.1
Workarounds
Do not use the replacements and the where option in the same query if you are not using Sequelize >= 6.19.1
References
See this thread for more information: https://github.com/sequelize/sequelize/issues/14519
Snyk: https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SEQUELIZE-2932027
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | sequelize | all versions | 6.19.1npm install sequelize@6.19.1 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sequelize, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update sequelize to 6.19.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.