GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 — kubeedge
MEDIUMGHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.4) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge. A fix is available for github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge — see the affected versions and patch details below.
KubeEdge Cloud Stream and Edge Stream DoS from large stream message
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge🐹github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge🐹github.com/kubeedge/kubeedgeReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The Cloud Stream server and the Edge Stream server reads the entire message into memory without imposing a limit on the size of this message. An attacker can exploit this by sending a large message to exhaust memory and cause a DoS. The Cloud Stream server and the Edge Stream server are under DoS attack in this case. The consequence of the exhaustion is that the CloudCore and EdgeCore will be in a denial of service. Only an authenticated user can cause this issue. It will be affected only when users enable cloudStream module in the config file cloudcore.yaml and enable edgeStream module in the config file edgecore.yaml as below. cloudcore.yaml:
modules:
...
cloudStream:
enable: true
edgecore.yaml:
modules:
...
edgeStream:
enable: true
Patches
This bug has been fixed in Kubeedge 1.11.1, 1.10.2, 1.9.4. Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue.
Workarounds
Disable cloudStream module in the config file cloudcore.yaml and disable edgeStream module in the config file edgecore.yaml, restart process cloudcore and edgecore after modification.
References
NA
Credits
Thanks David Korczynski and Adam Korczynski of ADA Logics for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the kubeedge security policy during a security audit sponsored by CNCF and facilitated by OSTIF.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in KubeEdge repo
- To make a vulnerability report, email your vulnerability to the private [email protected] list with the security details and the details expected for KubeEdge bug reports.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge | ≥ 1.11.0&&< 1.11.1 | 1.11.1go get github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge@v1.11.1 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge | ≥ 1.10.0&&< 1.10.2 | 1.10.2go get github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge@v1.10.2 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge | all versions | 1.9.4go get github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge@v1.9.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/kubeedge/kubeedge to 1.11.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-wrcr-x4qj-j543 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.