Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh — openclaw

MEDIUMFix: openclaw/openclaw@73d93de

GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh is a medium-severity (CVSS 6) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenClaw's MSTeams attachment redirect handling could bypass configured media host allowlists

Also known asCVE-2026-32037
Published
Mar 3, 2026
Updated
Mar 20, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs21th percentile — riskier than 21% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
openclawnpm
3.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

In OpenClaw MSTeams media download flows, redirect handling could bypass configured mediaAllowHosts checks in specific attachment paths. Redirect chains were not consistently constrained to allowlisted targets before accepting fetched content.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.2.21-2 (latest published at triage time)
  • Fixed in: 2026.2.22 (planned next release)

Impact

Attackers able to supply or influence attachment URLs could force redirect chains to non-allowlisted targets, weakening SSRF boundary controls for MSTeams media ingestion.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 73d93dee64127a26f1acd09d0403b794cdeb4f5c
  • b34097f62df9d1960cc22600269cd3f3284e2124

Release Process Note

patched_versions is pre-set to the planned next release (2026.2.22). Once that npm release is published, this advisory can be published without further version-field edits.

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopenclawall versions2026.2.22npm install openclaw@2026.2.22

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update openclaw to 2026.2.22 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary In OpenClaw MSTeams media download flows, redirect handling could bypass configured `mediaAllowHosts` checks in specific attachment paths. Redirect chains were not consistently constrained to allowlisted targets before accepting fetched content. ## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `<= 2026.2.21-2` (latest published at triage time) - Fixed in: `2026.2.22` (planned next release) ## Impact Attackers able to supply or influence attachment URLs could force redirect chains to non-allowlisted targets, weakening SSRF boundary controls for MSTea
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-w76h-8m22-hpgh: SSRF (Medium 6) | O3 Security