Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-w75w-9qv4-j5xj

dbt-common's commonprefix() doesn't protect against path traversal

Also known asCVE-2026-29790
Published
Mar 5, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk17th percentile+0.17%
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.1%0.1%0.1%0.3%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
🐍dbt-common🐍dbt-common

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

A path traversal vulnerability exists in dbt-common's safe_extract() function used when extracting tarball archives. The function uses os.path.commonprefix() to validate that extracted files remain within the intended destination directory. However, commonprefix() compares paths character-by-character rather than by path components, allowing a malicious tarball to write files to sibling directories with matching name prefixes.

For example, when extracting to /tmp/packages, a crafted tarball could write files to /tmp/packagesevil/ by exploiting the character-based prefix matching.

This vulnerability affects users who:

  • Install dbt packages from untrusted sources
  • Process tarball archives through dbt-common's extraction utilities

The practical risk is limited because:

  • Exploitation requires a malicious tarball to be processed
  • File writes are restricted to sibling directories with matching prefixes (not arbitrary paths)
  • Packages from trusted sources (dbt Hub) are not affected

This is similar to CVE-2026-1703 in pip, which had a CVSS score of 3.9 (Low).

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Fixed in dbt-common version 1.37.3 & 1.34.2, and patched for dbt-core 1.11.7 and 1.10.20 releases.

The fix replaces os.path.commonprefix() with os.path.commonpath(), which correctly compares paths by their components rather than characters.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

  • Only install dbt packages from trusted sources (official dbt Hub, verified git repositories)
  • Avoid installing packages from untrusted URLs or unverified third parties
  • Review package contents before installation when sourcing from external locations

Resources

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

  1. CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'): https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html
  2. CVE-2026-1703 (similar vulnerability in pip): https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1703
  3. pip fix PR #13777: https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/13777
  4. Python documentation on commonpath vs commonprefix: https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.path.html#os.path.commonpath

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIdbt-commonall versions1.34.2
🐍PyPIdbt-common1.35.0&&< 1.37.31.37.3

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for dbt-common. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update dbt-common to 1.34.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w75w-9qv4-j5xj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w75w-9qv4-j5xj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-w75w-9qv4-j5xj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ A path traversal vulnerability exists in dbt-common's `safe_extract()` function used when extracting tarball archives. The function uses `os.path.commonprefix()` to validate that extracted files remain within the intended destination directory. However, `commonprefix()` compares paths character-by-character rather than by path components, allowing a malicious tarball to write files to sibling directories with matching name prefixes. For example, when extracting to `/tmp/packages`, a crafted tarball could write files to `/tmp/pac
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w75w-9qv4-j5xj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-w75w-9qv4-j5xj across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.