GHSA-w5r5-m38g-f9f9
HIGHjoserfc's PBES2 p2c Unbounded Iteration Count enables Denial of Service (DoS)
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
joserfcReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A resource exhaustion vulnerability in joserfc allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via CPU exhaustion. When the library decrypts a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) token using Password-Based Encryption (PBES2) algorithms, it reads the p2c (PBES2 Count) parameter directly from the token's protected header. This parameter defines the number of iterations for the PBKDF2 key derivation function. Because joserfc does not validate or bound this value, an attacker can specify an extremely large iteration count (e.g., 2^31 - 1), forcing the server to expend massive CPU resources processing a single token.
This vulnerability exists at the JWA layer and impacts all high-level JWE and JWT decryption interfaces if PBES2 algorithms are allowed by the application's policy.
Details
Vulnerable file: src/joserfc/_rfc7518/jwe_algs.py
Vulnerable function: PBES2HSAlgKeyEncryption.decrypt_cek()
Lines: 283
def decrypt_cek(self, recipient: Recipient[OctKey]) -> bytes:
headers = recipient.headers()
# ...
p2c = headers["p2c"] # ← attacker-controlled integer
# ...
kek = self.compute_derived_key(key.get_op_key("deriveKey"), p2s, p2c)
The p2c value is then passed to compute_derived_key :
def compute_derived_key(self, key: bytes, p2s: bytes, p2c: int) -> bytes:
# ...
kdf = PBKDF2HMAC(
algorithm=self.hash_alg,
length=self.key_size // 8,
salt=salt,
iterations=p2c, # ← unbounded iterations
backend=default_backend(),
)
Impact on JWT Policies
Any JWT policy configured to allow PBES2 key management algorithms (e.g., PBES2-HS256+A128KW) is vulnerable. Because the DoS occurs during the decryption phase, the attack is triggered before any claim validation (e.g.,
exp,iss, aud checks) or nested signature verification takes place. This makes existing JWT "policies" ineffective as a defense if the underlying algorithm is permitted.
PoC
Tested against joserfc 1.6.2. Local Reproduction:
import time
from joserfc import jwe
from joserfc.jwk import OctKey
# Force joserfc to use local source if needed
# sys.path.insert(0, "src")
# Attacker-crafted token with 10 million iterations
# Normally legitimate p2c is ~2048-4096. 10M iterations = ~5s DoS.
token = "eyJhbGciOiJQQkVTMi1IUzI1NitBMTI4S1ciLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2IiwicDJzIjoiWjI5dVpYSm1ZdyIsInAyYyI6MTAwMDAwMDB9.dummy.dummy.dummy.dummy"
key = OctKey.import_key(b"any-password")
t0 = time.perf_counter()
try:
# This call will hang the thread for seconds
jwe.decrypt_compact(token, key, algorithms=["PBES2-HS256+A128KW", "A128CBC-HS256"])
except Exception:
pass
print(f"Elapsed: {time.perf_counter() - t0:.2f}s")
Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exhaust the CPU resources of a server by sending a small number of crafted JWE/JWT tokens. Each token will occupy a worker thread/process for a duration proportional to the p2c value (up to several minutes or hours depending on the integer value). This results in a complete Denial of Service for legitimate users.
Recommendation
Minimal fix: Implement an upper bound check for the p2c parameter in PBES2HSAlgKeyEncryption.decrypt_cek().
MAX_P2C = 300000 # Example security bound
# ... inside decrypt_cek ...
p2c = headers["p2c"]
if not isinstance(p2c, int) or p2c > MAX_P2C:
raise DecodeError(f"p2c iteration count too high (max {MAX_P2C})")
Additionally, applications should only enable PBES2 algorithms if password-based encryption is specifically required and should enforce a strict algorithms allowlist in their JWT/JWE policies.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | joserfc | all versions | 1.6.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for joserfc. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update joserfc to 1.6.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w5r5-m38g-f9f9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w5r5-m38g-f9f9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-w5r5-m38g-f9f9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-w5r5-m38g-f9f9 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-w5r5-m38g-f9f9 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.