Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io

GHSA-w5p8-4jcx-2j6r

imageproc: integer overflow in kernel size check leads to out-of-bounds read

Also known asRUSTSEC-2026-0116
Published
May 7, 2026
Updated
May 20, 2026
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
4 / 4
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

4 pkgs affected
🦀imageproc🦀imageproc🦀imageproc🦀imageproc

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A bounds verification of a slice storage of a 2-dimensional matrix's coefficients (a kernel) would compare the total size against the product of individual dimensions. This would erroneously cast after the multiplication and consequently fail to detect possible violations when overflow occurs.

Afterwards, the individual sizes were trusted to properly constrain coordinates within the matrix to indices valid for the underlying storage. With a crafted Kernel object, certain combinations of coordinates could then cause an out-of-bounds access in an unsafe function while fulfilling its documented preconditions. The kernel value could be passed to library functions that trusted the preconditions and then performed such reads.

Affected Packages

4 total 4 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.ioimageprocall versions0.23.1
🦀crates.ioimageproc0.24.0&&< 0.24.10.24.1
🦀crates.ioimageproc0.25.0&&< 0.25.10.25.1
🦀crates.ioimageproc0.26.0&&< 0.26.20.26.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for imageproc. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update imageproc to 0.23.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w5p8-4jcx-2j6r is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w5p8-4jcx-2j6r is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-w5p8-4jcx-2j6r. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

A bounds verification of a slice storage of a 2-dimensional matrix's coefficients (a kernel) would compare the total size against the product of individual dimensions. This would erroneously cast *after* the multiplication and consequently fail to detect possible violations when overflow occurs. Afterwards, the individual sizes were trusted to properly constrain coordinates within the matrix to indices valid for the underlying storage. With a crafted `Kernel` object, certain combinations of coordinates could then cause an out-of-bounds access in an `unsafe` function while fulfilling its docum
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w5p8-4jcx-2j6r in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-w5p8-4jcx-2j6r across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.