Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh dtls

MEDIUMFix: pion/dtls@d2f7971

GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-295 vulnerability in github.com/pion/dtls. A fix is available for github.com/pion/dtls — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Pion/DLTS Accepts Client Certificates Without CertificateVerify

Also known asCVE-2022-29222GO-2022-0462
Published
May 25, 2022
Updated
Nov 8, 2023
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs55th percentile — riskier than 55% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/pion/dtls🐹github.com/pion/dtls/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

A DTLS Client could provide a Certificate that it doesn't posses the private key for and Pion DTLS wouldn't reject it.

This issue affects users that are using Client certificates only. The connection itself is still secure. The Certificate provided by clients can't be trusted when using a Pion DTLS server prior to v2.1.5

Patches

Upgrade to Pion DTLS v2.1.5

Workarounds

No workarounds available, upgrade to Pion DTLS v2.1.5

References

Thank you to Juho Nurminen and the Mattermost team for discovering and reporting this.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/pion/dtlsall versions2.1.5go get github.com/pion/dtls@v2.1.5
🐹Gogithub.com/pion/dtls/v2all versions2.1.5go get github.com/pion/dtls/v2@v2.1.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/pion/dtls, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/pion/dtls to 2.1.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact A DTLS Client could provide a Certificate that it doesn't posses the private key for and Pion DTLS wouldn't reject it. This issue affects users that are using Client certificates only. The connection itself is still secure. The Certificate provided by clients can't be trusted when using a Pion DTLS server prior to v2.1.5 ### Patches Upgrade to Pion DTLS v2.1.5 ### Workarounds No workarounds available, upgrade to Pion DTLS v2.1.5 ### References Thank you to [Juho Nurminen](https://github.com/jupenur) and the Mattermost team for discovering and reporting this. ### For more info
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-w45j-f832-hxvh: dtls (Medium 5.9) | O3 Security