russh: Agent server never calls `Agent::confirm`, so keys added with the confirm constraint (`ssh-add -c`) sign without confirmationGHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv
Fix: Eugeny/russh@3e04597GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv is a CWE-862 vulnerability in russh. A fix is available for russh — see the affected versions and patch details below.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
russhReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The agent server in russh::keys::agent::server never calls Agent::confirm before signing with a key that was added with the confirm constraint. That constraint is SSH_AGENT_CONSTRAIN_CONFIRM (RFC 9987 §5.2.7.2), which is what ssh-add -c sends.
The call was replaced by a hard-coded true in 3e04597 ("Native async traits encore", #455), first released in 0.50.0-beta.12. Every release since, up to and including 0.64.1, signs requests for confirm-constrained keys without asking the Agent implementation. A user who added a key with -c is therefore never asked to confirm.
Details
Connection::try_sign notes that the key needs confirmation, then awaits a ready future instead of the agent (server.rs L348-L360 at v0.64.1):
let agent = if needs_confirm {
let (agent, ok) = {
let _pk = key.clone();
Box::new(futures::future::ready((agent, true)))
}
.await;
if !ok {
return Ok((agent, false));
}
agent
} else {
agent
};
Before 3e04597 the first statement was let (agent, ok) = agent.confirm(key.clone()).await;.
try_sign was checked in the published crates on crates.io:
- Every russh release from 0.50.0-beta.12 to 0.64.1 (52 versions) has the hard-coded
true. - russh 0.50.0-beta.8 to beta.11 call
agent.confirm. - Earlier russh releases have no agent server. It lived in russh-keys, and no russh-keys release is affected.
Not affected:
Agentimplementations that keep the defaultconfirm, which returnstrueanyway.- Checks made in
Agent::confirm_request, which is still called withMessageType::Signfor every sign request (L158-L159). - The agent client, and the SSH client and server.
PoC
- Add this test to
mod testinrussh/src/keys/mod.rs. It uses the module's existingIncominghelper andED25519_KEY. - Run
cargo test -p russh --lib keys::test::test_agent_confirms_keys_added_with_the_confirm_constraint.
#[tokio::test]
#[cfg(unix)]
async fn test_agent_confirms_keys_added_with_the_confirm_constraint() {
use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering};
// An agent whose user refuses every confirmation prompt.
#[derive(Clone)]
struct Refuse(std::sync::Arc<AtomicUsize>);
impl agent::server::Agent for Refuse {
fn confirm(
self,
_: std::sync::Arc<PrivateKey>,
) -> Box<dyn Future<Output = (Self, bool)> + Send + Unpin> {
self.0.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst);
Box::new(futures::future::ready((self, false)))
}
}
let prompts = std::sync::Arc::new(AtomicUsize::new(0));
let dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap();
let agent_path = dir.path().join("agent");
let mut listener = tokio::net::UnixListener::bind(&agent_path).unwrap();
let agent = Refuse(prompts.clone());
tokio::spawn(async move {
agent::server::serve(
Incoming {
listener: &mut listener,
},
agent,
)
.await
});
let key = decode_secret_key(ED25519_KEY, Some("blabla")).unwrap();
let public = key.public_key().clone();
let stream = tokio::net::UnixStream::connect(&agent_path).await.unwrap();
let mut client = agent::client::AgentClient::connect(stream);
// What `ssh-add -c` sends.
client
.add_identity(&key, &[agent::Constraint::Confirm])
.await
.unwrap();
let signed = client
.sign_request(&AgentIdentity::from(public), None, b"data".to_vec())
.await;
let confirm_calls = prompts.load(Ordering::SeqCst);
assert!(
signed.is_err(),
"the agent signed with a confirm-constrained key without asking: \
Agent::confirm was called {confirm_calls} time(s)"
);
assert_eq!(
confirm_calls, 1,
"Agent::confirm should be asked exactly once"
);
}
On v0.64.1 (e5d80a0) the test fails:
the agent signed with a confirm-constrained key without asking: Agent::confirm was called 0 time(s)
With the fix below it passes, and so do all 46 keys:: tests.
Impact
A russh-based agent whose Agent::confirm asks the user, or applies any other check, signs every request for a confirm-constrained key without running that check. Anyone who can talk to the agent can then use the key without the user's approval:
- other local processes of the user;
- the remote host, when the agent is forwarded (
ssh -A).
Preventing exactly this is the purpose of the confirm constraint. RFC 9987 §10 names it as what stops an attacker with access to the agent from "stealing use of those keys".
Because the agent accepts the constraint, ssh-add -c reports success and the user believes the key is protected. RFC 9987 §5.2.7 says an agent that does not support a constraint MUST refuse the key instead.
The private key itself is not exposed. The impact is unauthorized use of it for as long as the attacker can reach the agent: logging in to other hosts as the user, or signing data such as git commits.
Known affected downstream user (from its public code; not tested): Proton Pass desktop, which uses russh 0.62.7.
- It adds every key with
Constraint::Confirm(mod.rs L332). - It uses
Agent::confirmas its "Pass is unlocked" check before signing, and defersMessageType::Signfromconfirm_requestto it (L75-L100). That check never runs. - Proton also removes keys from the agent on lock and logout (ssh-agent.middleware.ts L23-L27).
So the exposure there is limited to states in which keys stay loaded while Pass is not unlocked. Their own code notes, for example, that the agent persists across renderer reloads and account switches.
Suggested fix
--- a/russh/src/keys/agent/server.rs
+++ b/russh/src/keys/agent/server.rs
@@ -346,11 +346,7 @@ impl<S: AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Send + Unpin + 'static, A: Agent + Send + Sync
}
};
let agent = if needs_confirm {
- let (agent, ok) = {
- let _pk = key.clone();
- Box::new(futures::future::ready((agent, true)))
- }
- .await;
+ let (agent, ok) = agent.confirm(key.clone()).await;
if !ok {
return Ok((agent, false));
}
When confirm returns false, try_sign returns false and the agent answers SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, as it did before the regression.
Compatibility note for the release notes: confirm is called again for confirm-constrained keys, so implementations that stub it out will now hit that stub.
- For example, Litterbox implements
confirmastodo!()(agent.rs L81-L87). - Each connection runs in its own task, so such a panic ends only that connection.
Related but separate: with the default confirm, the agent still accepts the confirm constraint without enforcing it. Given RFC 9987 §5.2.7, refusing such keys when the application does not implement confirm may be worth considering.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | russh | all versions | 0.65cargo update -p russh --precise 0.65 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for russh, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update russh to 0.65 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is rated as Moderate severity for Red Hat products because exploitation is confined to environments where an attacker already has access to the local agent socket or a forwarded session, and it does not allow extraction of private key material. In typical deployments, the issue only manifests when…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.