Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-v959-qxv6-6f8p

HIGH

ZITADEL Vulnerable to Account Takeover via DOM-Based XSS in Zitadel V2 Login

Also known asCVE-2025-67495GO-2025-4213
Published
Dec 8, 2025
Updated
Dec 15, 2025
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
3 / 4
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk17th percentile+0.22%
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.1%0.3%Jan 26Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

4 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/zitadel/zitadel🐹github.com/zitadel/zitadel🐹github.com/zitadel/zitadel🐹github.com/zitadel/zitadel/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A potential vulnerability exists in ZITADEL's logout endpoint in login V2. This endpoint accepts serval parameters including a post_logout_redirect. When this parameter is specified, users will be redirected to the site that is provided via this parameter. ZITADEL's login UI did not ensure that this parameter contained an allowed value and even executed passed scripts.

Impact

Zitadel is vulnerable to a DOM-Based XSS vulnerability. More specifically, the /logout endpoint insecurely routed to value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, malicious JS code could be executed on Zitadel users’ browsers, in the Zitadel V2 Login domain.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this DOM-based XSS vulnerability, and thus, execute malicious JavaScript code on behalf of Zitadel users. By doing so, such an attacker could reset the password of their victims, and take over their accounts.

Note that for this to work, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser. Additionally, it's important to note that an account takeover is mitigated for accounts that have Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication enabled.

Affected Versions

Systems using the login UI (v2) and running one of the following versions are affected:

  • v4.x: 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0

Patches

The vulnerability has been addressed in the latest release. The patch resolves the issue by ensuring the information was passed for the ZITADEL API using a JSON Web Token (JWT). If you're running your own login UI, we recommend switching over to the new logout_token parameter, which contains all information previously passed via specific query parameters. The contained JWT's signature needs to be verified with the instance OAuth2/OIDC public keys (jwks_uri).

Before you upgrade, ensure that:

  • the ZITADEL_API_URL is set and is pointing to your instance, resp. system in multi-instance deployments.
  • the HTTP host (or a x-forwarded-host) is passed in your reverse proxy to the login UI.
  • a x-zitadel-instance-host (or x-zitadel-forward-host) is set in your reverse for multi-instance deployments. If you're running a single instance solution, you don't need to take any actions.

Patched versions:

  • 4.x: Upgrade to >=4.7.1

Workarounds

The recommended solution is to update ZITADEL to a patched version.

Questions

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please email us at [email protected]

Credits

Thanks to Amit Laish – GE Vernova for finding and reporting the vulnerability.

Affected Packages

4 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/zitadel/zitadelall versions1.80.0-v2.20.0.20251208091519-4c879b47334e
🐹Gogithub.com/zitadel/zitadel1.83.4No fix
🐹Gogithub.com/zitadel/zitadel4.0.0-rc.1&&< 4.7.14.7.1
🐹Gogithub.com/zitadel/zitadel/v2all versions1.80.0-v2.20.0.20251208091519-4c879b47334e

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/zitadel/zitadel. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/zitadel/zitadel to 1.80.0-v2.20.0.20251208091519-4c879b47334e or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-v959-qxv6-6f8p is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-v959-qxv6-6f8p is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-v959-qxv6-6f8p. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A potential vulnerability exists in ZITADEL's logout endpoint in login V2. This endpoint accepts serval parameters including a `post_logout_redirect`. When this parameter is specified, users will be redirected to the site that is provided via this parameter. ZITADEL's login UI did not ensure that this parameter contained an allowed value and even executed passed scripts. ### Impact Zitadel is vulnerable to a DOM-Based XSS vulnerability. More specifically, the /logout endpoint insecurely routed to value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, mali
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-v959-qxv6-6f8p in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-v959-qxv6-6f8p across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.