Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv

MEDIUM

GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.7) vulnerability in aws-encryption-sdk. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

AWS Encryption SDK for Python: Key commitment policy bypass via shared key cache

Also known asCVE-2026-6550PYSEC-2026-2387
Published
Apr 24, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐍aws-encryption-sdk🐍aws-encryption-sdk

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

AWS Encryption SDK (ESDK) for Python is a client-side encryption library. An issue exists where, under certain circumstances, a specific cryptographic algorithm downgrade in the caching layer might allow an authenticated local threat actor to bypass key commitment policy enforcement via a shared key cache, resulting in ciphertext that can be decrypted to multiple different plaintexts.

Impact

This issue requires all of the following conditions to be true: (1) Two ESDK for Python clients with different commitment policies share a single CachingCryptoMaterialsManager instance within the same process. (2) The client with the weaker commitment policy encrypts first, warming the cache. (3) Both clients use matching encryption contexts. (4) Both clients use the pre-configured default algorithm suite.

These conditions may occur during a migration from ESDK for Python v1 to newer versions, as v1 did not support key commitment.

When the weaker-policy client encrypts first, the cache stores encryption materials that do not enforce key commitment. Subsequent callers — including those configured to require key commitment — are served these cached materials instead of generating new ones that satisfy their policy. This results in encryption without key commitment, meaning the same ciphertext can be validly decrypted to different plaintexts under different keys (the "Invisible Salamanders" issue; see https://github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-wqgp-vphw-hphf). A threat actor who controls ciphertext can cause a recipient to decrypt a message different from what the sender encrypted, breaking message integrity.

Impacted versions

  • From 2.0 to 2.5.1
  • From 3.0 to 3.3.0
  • From 4.0 to 4.0.4

Patches

This issue has been addressed in ESDK for Python versions 3.3.1 and 4.0.5. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and ensuring any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.

Workarounds

If a customer requires operating multiple instances of the Python ESDK each with differently configured key commitment policies, they must not share a key cache.

References If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, contact AWS Security through the vulnerability reporting page or directly via email to [email protected]. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

Acknowledgement

Thanks to 1seal.org for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIaws-encryption-sdk2.0.0&&< 3.3.13.3.1
🐍PyPIaws-encryption-sdk4.0.0&&< 4.0.54.0.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aws-encryption-sdk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update aws-encryption-sdk to 3.3.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary AWS Encryption SDK (ESDK) for Python is a client-side encryption library. An issue exists where, under certain circumstances, a specific cryptographic algorithm downgrade in the caching layer might allow an authenticated local threat actor to bypass key commitment policy enforcement via a shared key cache, resulting in ciphertext that can be decrypted to multiple different plaintexts. ## Impact This issue requires all of the following conditions to be true: (1) Two ESDK for Python clients with different commitment policies share a single CachingCryptoMaterialsManager instance withi
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-v638-38fc-rhfv across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.