Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf

HIGHFix: markedjs/marked@c4a3ccd

GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in marked. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked

Also known asCVE-2022-21680
Published
Jan 14, 2022
Updated
Aug 3, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.

markednpm
62.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it?

Denial of service.

The regular expression block.def may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings. PoC is the following.

import * as marked from "marked";

marked.parse(`[x]:${' '.repeat(1500)}x ${' '.repeat(1500)} x`);

Who is impacted?

Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.

Patches

Has the problem been patched?

Yes

What versions should users upgrade to?

4.0.10

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmmarkedall versions4.0.10
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for marked. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update marked to 4.0.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it?_ Denial of service. The regular expression `block.def` may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings. PoC is the following. ```javascript import * as marked from "marked"; marked.parse(`[x]:${' '.repeat(1500)}x ${' '.repeat(1500)} x`); ``` _Who is impacted?_ Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched?_ Yes _What versions should users upgrade to?_ 4.0.10 ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.