Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

Open WebUI: Account takeover via OAuth token exchange accepting tokens issued to any clientGHSA-rq84-p6rr-vf89

HIGHFix: open-webui/open-webui@b190dcf

GHSA-rq84-p6rr-vf89 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Improper Authentication vulnerability in open-webui. A fix is available for open-webui — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-70482PYSEC-2026-3652
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 13, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rq84-p6rr-vf89.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs46th percentile — riskier than 46% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.36%0.71%1.07%0.3%0.6%0.6%Sep 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-rq84-p6rr-vf89 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 386,684 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍open-webui

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The OAuth token exchange endpoint accepts a raw provider access token and validates it by calling the provider's userinfo endpoint. A userinfo endpoint reports only that a token is valid, never which OAuth client it was issued to, and the endpoint performed no audience or client check of its own. Anyone holding an access token minted for any client registered with the same provider could exchange it for an Open WebUI session as that token's user, including applications the operator does not control and has never authorised.

Preconditions

  • ENABLE_OAUTH_TOKEN_EXCHANGE=True. Disabled by default, so a stock deployment is not affected.
  • The victim already has an Open WebUI account. The endpoint does not create users.
  • The attacker can obtain a provider access token for the victim, typically by having them sign in to an unrelated OAuth application on the same provider. On public providers, registering that application is self-service.
  • The subject identifier the attacker's client observes matches the one stored on the victim's account. Google, GitHub, Okta and self-hosted OIDC servers in default configuration issue a subject that is stable across all clients and are directly affected. Microsoft Entra ID issues per-application subjects, so the match fails there unless OAUTH_MERGE_ACCOUNTS_BY_EMAIL is enabled or OAUTH_SUB_CLAIM points at a globally stable claim such as oid.
  • OAUTH_ALLOWED_DOMAINS is enforced on this endpoint but does not constrain the attack, because the impersonated user is a legitimate member of an allowed domain.

Impact

Full account takeover of any user whose provider access token the attacker can obtain. The endpoint applies no role gating, so the issued session carries the target account's role, and a targeted administrator yields an administrator session. The victim never interacts with Open WebUI and has no opportunity to notice.

The standard OAuth callback is not affected. It obtains its token through an authorization-code exchange authenticated with the client secret, so the token is inherently bound to Open WebUI's own client, and the ID token's audience is validated.

Fix

Fixed in 0.11.0. The endpoint now resolves which OAuth client a presented token was issued to through RFC 7662 token introspection, and rejects tokens minted for any client not named in OAUTH_TOKEN_EXCHANGE_TRUSTED_CLIENT_IDS. Only the introspected client_id is honoured; the aud field is ignored, because it names intended resource servers rather than the issuing client and several providers let any client place another client's identifier there.

Upgrading alone is not sufficient. The check is opt-in: with OAUTH_TOKEN_EXCHANGE_TRUSTED_CLIENT_IDS unset the endpoint behaves as it did before, so any deployment running with ENABLE_OAUTH_TOKEN_EXCHANGE=True must also set that list. It is a deploy-time environment variable and cannot be changed from the admin interface, so a compromised administrator session cannot widen the trust boundary at runtime.

Providers that do not implement RFC 7662 introspection, including Google, Microsoft Entra ID, GitHub and Feishu, cannot be restricted this way at all. On those, token exchange has no safe configuration and should be left disabled.

Root cause

  • backend/open_webui/routers/auths.py, token_exchange (POST /api/v1/auths/oauth/{provider}/token/exchange)

Token exchange skips the authorization-code step entirely and trusts a token supplied by the caller. The only validation performed was a userinfo lookup, which answers whether a token is valid rather than who issued it, so the endpoint had no way to distinguish a token minted for Open WebUI from one minted for an unrelated application.

Proof of concept

Reproduced against a mock OIDC provider serving two tokens for the same end user, minted for two different clients, with OAUTH_ALLOWED_DOMAINS=corp.example actively enforced.

CaseTokenResult
Controlnot recognised by the provider400 rejected
Outsider's own account, non-allowed domainminted for attacker-evil-app403 blocked by domain allowlist
Victim's account, foreign clientminted for attacker-evil-app200, session issued for [email protected]

The issued session token was confirmed usable: GET /api/v1/auths/ returned 200 authenticated as the victim. The provider log recorded the token as minted for client_id='attacker-evil-app', while Open WebUI's own client is openwebui-client-id.

Credits

Reported by @Classic298.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIopen-webui≥ 0.8.0&&< 0.11.00.11.0pip install --upgrade 'open-webui==0.11.0'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
open webuiopenwebui
≥ 0.8.0 && < 0.11.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update open-webui to 0.11.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rq84-p6rr-vf89 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The OAuth token exchange endpoint accepts a raw provider access token and validates it by calling the provider's userinfo endpoint. A userinfo endpoint reports only that a token is valid, never which OAuth client it was issued to, and the endpoint performed no audience or client check of its own. Anyone holding an access token minted for any client registered with the same provider could exchange it for an Open WebUI session as that token's user, including applications the operator does not control and has never authorised. ## Preconditions - `ENABLE_OAUTH_TOKEN_EXCHANGE=True`. D
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rq84-p6rr-vf89 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Open WebUI: Account takeover via OAuth token…