GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 — giskard-checks
MEDIUMGHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.5) CWE-1333 vulnerability in giskard-checks. A fix is available for giskard-checks — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Giskard has a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in RegexMatching Check
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
giskard-checksReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The RegexMatching check in the giskard-checks package passes a user-supplied regular expression pattern directly to Python's re.search() without any timeout, complexity guard, or pattern validation. An attacker who can control the regex pattern or the text being matched can craft inputs that trigger catastrophic backtracking in the regex engine, causing the process to hang indefinitely and denying service to all other operations.
giskard-checks is a local developer testing library. Check definitions, including the pattern parameter, are provided in application code or configuration files and executed locally. Exploitation requires write access to a check definition and subsequent execution of the test suite. The absence of a regex timeout could cause availability issues in automated environments such as CI/CD pipelines.
Affected component
text_matching.py, line 457: re.search(pattern, text)
Remediation
Upgrade to giskard-checks >= 1.0.2b1.
Credit
Giskard-AI thanks @dhabaleshwar for identifying the missing timeout on regex evaluation.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | giskard-checks | all versions | 1.0.2b1pip install --upgrade 'giskard-checks==1.0.2b1' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for giskard-checks, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update giskard-checks to 1.0.2b1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-rq2q-4r55-9877 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.