How severe is GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6?

GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 affects the following packages: triton-vm (crates.io). Ecosystems affected: crates.io.

How do I fix GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6?

Update triton-vm to 2.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 in my crates.io dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for triton-vm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6?

O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Is GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

When was GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 was published on January 21, 2026 and was last updated on February 22, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🦀 crates.io

Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 — triton-vm

Fix: TritonVM/triton-vm@3a045d6

GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 is a security vulnerability in triton-vm. A fix is available for triton-vm — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Triton VM has a Soundness Vulnerability due to Improper Sampling of Randomness

Also known asRUSTSEC-2026-0004

Published

Jan 21, 2026

Updated

Feb 22, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Feb 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🦀triton-vm

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

In affected versions of Triton VM, the verifier failed to correctly sample randomness in the FRI sub-protocol.

Malicious provers can exploit this to craft proofs for arbitrary statements that this verifier accepts as valid, undermining soundness.

Protocols that rely on proofs and the supplied verifier of the affected versions of Triton VM are completely broken. Protocols implementing their own verifier might be unaffected.

The flaw was corrected in commit 3a045d63, where the relevant randomness is sampled correctly.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🦀crates.io	`triton-vm`	≥ 0.41.0&&< 2.0.0	2.0.0`cargo update -p triton-vm --precise 2.0.0`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for triton-vm, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update triton-vm to 2.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

In affected versions of Triton VM, the verifier failed to correctly sample randomness in the FRI sub-protocol. Malicious provers can exploit this to craft proofs for arbitrary statements that this verifier accepts as valid, undermining soundness. Protocols that rely on proofs and the supplied verifier of the affected versions of Triton VM are completely broken. Protocols implementing their own verifier might be unaffected. The flaw was corrected in commit 3a045d63, where the relevant randomness is sampled correctly.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-rjr4-v43m-pxq6 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works