Decimal: Unbounded exponent in `Decimal.new` enables unauthenticated DoSGHSA-rhv4-8758-jx7v
Fix: ericmj/decimal@6a523f3GHSA-rhv4-8758-jx7v is a Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in decimal. A fix is available for decimal — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rhv4-8758-jx7v.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
decimalReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Hex packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
decimal doesn't bound the exponent on parsed input, so something like "1e10000000" is parsed fine but then explodes the memory to more than 7GB if you run e.g. Decimal.add(Decimal.parse("1e10000000"), 1) because for positive exp, the function tail-recurses with coef * 10 and exp - 1 per iteration, growing the bignum coefficient by one digit each step. In the worst case, one request is enough to OOM the BEAM.
Details
Decimal.new/parse/cast happily store huge exponents. After that, a bunch of core paths allocate proportional to exp:
add/sub/divgo throughadd_align, which callspow10(exp1 - exp2)and builds a giant bignum (lib/decimal.ex:1734-1738, 1827).to_string/2with:normal(also:xsdand theString.Charsimpl) does:lists.duplicate(exp, ?0)(lib/decimal.ex:1506, 1513).to_integer/1recursescoef * 10,exp - 1once per unit ofexp(lib/decimal.ex:1603-1605).round/3does the same:lists.duplicatetrick on the exp difference (lib/decimal.ex:1850, 1874).compare/3with a threshold argument loops back intoadd/sub, so it's vulnerable too (lib/decimal.ex:331-332).
PoC
Any of these will hang or OOM the BEAM:
Decimal.add(Decimal.new("1"), Decimal.new("1e1000000000"))
Decimal.to_string(Decimal.new("1e1000000000"), :normal)
Decimal.to_integer(Decimal.new("1e1000000000"))
Decimal.round(Decimal.new("1e1000000000"))
Impact
Unauthenticated remote DoS. Anything that takes a user-supplied decimal (JSON, form field, Ecto :decimal field — basically everywhere) and then does arithmetic, rounding, to_integer, or to_string on it is exposed. One request can kill the node with a Out-of-Memory exception.
Note on the security fixes done in version 2.4.0
While 2.4.0 has the changes to mitigate this issue it's not considered as a patched version because it doesn't have them enabled by default.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💧Hex | decimal | ≥ 0.1.0&&< 3.0.0 | 3.0.0mix deps.update decimal |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for decimal, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update decimal to 3.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rhv4-8758-jx7v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-rhv4-8758-jx7v in your dependencies?
Find it across Hex, including transitive dependencies.