GitPython: Unsafe git option guard bypass via single-character kwarg value token smuggling enables arbitrary command executionGHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3
HIGHFix: gitpython-developers/GitPython#2180GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) OS Command Injection vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
gitpythonReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
GitPython's check_unsafe_options guard (the control introduced by CVE-2026-42215 / GHSA-2f96 and hardened since) can be bypassed for every guarded method (clone/clone_from, fetch/pull/push, ls_remote, iter_commits, blame, archive) by smuggling an option token inside the VALUE of a single-character kwarg. In the default allow_unsafe_options=False configuration this yields arbitrary command execution via --upload-pack.
Root Cause
The guard builds its candidate option list from kwarg KEYS only: _option_candidates([], {"n":"--upload-pack=<cmd>"}) returns ['-n'] (cmd.py:1042-1046 derives the candidate from the key, never the value). -n is not on the denylist, so check_unsafe_options passes. But transform_kwarg('n', value, split_single_char_options=True) (cmd.py:1600-1606) emits two argv tokens ['-n', '--upload-pack=<cmd>']. git then parses the second token as --upload-pack and executes the attacker-supplied command. The guard never inspects the value that becomes a separate argv token.
Impact
Arbitrary OS command execution as the host process (via --upload-pack) in the default configuration, affecting all guarded methods since they all build candidates through the name-only _option_candidates.
Proof of Concept
from git import Repo
Repo.clone_from(bare_repo, out_dir, n="--upload-pack=touch /tmp/ACE;git-upload-pack")
# /tmp/ACE created -> ACE. Direct-name form upload_pack="..." is correctly BLOCKED.
File-write variant on a guarded revision command: iter_commits('HEAD', g='--output=/path') -> candidate ['-g'] passes, argv ['-g','--output=/path'], victim file truncated.
Attack Chain
- Entry: app forwards a user-supplied options dict ->
Repo.clone_from(url, path, n="--upload-pack=touch /tmp/ACE;git-upload-pack"). Guard:check_unsafe_options(options=_option_candidates([], kwargs), unsafe=unsafe_git_clone_options)at base.py. Bypass proof:_option_candidates([], {"n":"--upload-pack=..."})->['-n'](key-only), not on denylist -> no UnsafeOptionError (verified live). - Transform:
transform_kwarg('n', value, split_single_char_options=True)->['-n', '--upload-pack=touch /tmp/ACE;git-upload-pack']. Guard: none (guard already passed on name-only candidate). Bypass proof: verified transform emits two tokens. - Sink:
git clone -n --upload-pack='touch ...;git-upload-pack' -- <src> <dst>; git parses and runs the second token. Impact: ACE (marker created, verified end-to-end).
Bypass Evidence
Live-verified on HEAD (tag 3.1.53): _option_candidates returns key-only candidate ['-n']; transform_kwargs emits the smuggled --upload-pack= token; clone_from with the payload created the marker file; the direct-name upload_pack= form raised UnsafeOptionError. All prior bypasses (GHSA-rpm5 underscore key, GHSA-2f96 long-option abbreviation, GHSA-v396 joined short option, GHSA-x2qx multi-before-split) are BLOCKED on HEAD — this is a distinct kwarg-value->separate-token vector.
Affected Versions
<= 3.1.53
Suggested Fix
Make _option_candidates also emit candidates derived from single-character kwarg VALUES when split_single_char_options is in effect, OR run check_unsafe_options over the fully-transformed argv rather than the reconstructed name-only candidate list.
Reported by zx (Jace) — GitHub: @manus-use
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gitpython | all versions | 3.1.54pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.54' |
Affected Products
gitpythongitpython_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gitpython to 3.1.54 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This is an Important remote code execution vulnerability in GitPython, affecting Red Hat products that utilize GitPython versions prior to 3.1.54. The flaw allows an attacker to bypass input sanitization by smuggling malicious Git options within single-character keyword arguments, leading to arbitrary command…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8 | foreman-0:3.12.0.23-1.el8sat | RHSA-2026:74506 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9 | foreman-0:3.14.0.22-1.el9sat | RHSA-2026:74505 |
| Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 | python3.12-gitpython-0:3.1.59-1.el9pc | RHSA-2026:63385 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 | ansible-automation-platform-25/controller-rhel8:1789607021 | RHSA-2026:71210 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 | ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9:1789673739 | RHSA-2026:71179 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7 | ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9:1788918363 | RHSA-2026:67279 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1788315638 | RHSA-2026:65126 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9:1792148523 | RHSA-2026:87410 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.