Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf openclaw

HIGHFix: openclaw/openclaw@7d8aeaa

GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf is a high-severity (CVSS 8) CWE-290 vulnerability in openclaw. A fix is available for openclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

OpenClaw: Node reconnect metadata spoofing could bypass platform-based node command policy

Also known asCVE-2026-32014
Published
Mar 3, 2026
Updated
Mar 20, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs9th percentile — riskier than 9% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

133other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
openclawnpm
2.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

A paired node device could reconnect with spoofed platform/deviceFamily metadata and broaden node command policy eligibility because reconnect metadata was accepted from the client while these fields were not bound into the device-auth signature.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.2.25
  • Latest published version at update time: 2026.2.25
  • Patched version (pre-set for next release): 2026.2.26

Impact

In configurations where node command policy differs by platform, an attacker with an already paired node identity on the trusted network could spoof reconnect metadata and gain access to commands that should remain blocked for the originally paired platform.

Fix

  • Add device-auth payload v3 that signs normalized platform and deviceFamily.
  • Verify v3 first (fallback to v2 for compatibility), while pinning paired metadata server-side.
  • Reject reconnect metadata mismatches and require explicit repair pairing to change pinned metadata.
  • Add regression coverage for reconnect spoof attempts.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 7d8aeaaf06e2e616545d2c2cec7fa27f36b59b6a

Release Process Note

patched_versions is pre-set to the planned next release 2026.2.26; once that npm release is published, the advisory can be published without further field edits.

OpenClaw thanks @76embiid21 for reporting.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopenclawall versions2026.2.26npm install openclaw@2026.2.26

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for openclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update openclaw to 2026.2.26 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary A paired node device could reconnect with spoofed `platform`/`deviceFamily` metadata and broaden node command policy eligibility because reconnect metadata was accepted from the client while these fields were not bound into the device-auth signature. ## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Affected versions: `<= 2026.2.25` - Latest published version at update time: `2026.2.25` - Patched version (pre-set for next release): `2026.2.26` ## Impact In configurations where node command policy differs by platform, an attacker with an already paired node identity
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-r65x-2hqr-j5hf: openclaw (High 8) | O3 Security