Arbitrary File Creation/Overwrite via insufficient symlink protection due to directory cache poisoningGHSA-r628-mhmh-qjhw
HIGHFix: isaacs/node-tar@46fe350GHSA-r628-mhmh-qjhw is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) Path Traversal vulnerability in tar. A fix is available for tar — see the affected versions and patch details below.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-r628-mhmh-qjhw by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 385,738 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
tarnpmDescription
Impact
Arbitrary File Creation, Arbitrary File Overwrite, Arbitrary Code Execution
node-tar aims to guarantee that any file whose location would be modified by a symbolic link is not extracted. This is, in part, achieved by ensuring that extracted directories are not symlinks. Additionally, in order to prevent unnecessary stat calls to determine whether a given path is a directory, paths are cached when directories are created.
This logic was insufficient when extracting tar files that contained both a directory and a symlink with the same name as the directory. This order of operations resulted in the directory being created and added to the node-tar directory cache. When a directory is present in the directory cache, subsequent calls to mkdir for that directory are skipped. However, this is also where node-tar checks for symlinks occur.
By first creating a directory, and then replacing that directory with a symlink, it was thus possible to bypass node-tar symlink checks on directories, essentially allowing an untrusted tar file to symlink into an arbitrary location and subsequently extracting arbitrary files into that location, thus allowing arbitrary file creation and overwrite.
This issue was addressed in releases 3.2.3, 4.4.15, 5.0.7 and 6.1.2.
Patches
3.2.3 || 4.4.15 || 5.0.7 || 6.1.2
Workarounds
Users may work around this vulnerability without upgrading by creating a custom filter method which prevents the extraction of symbolic links.
const tar = require('tar')
tar.x({
file: 'archive.tgz',
filter: (file, entry) => {
if (entry.type === 'SymbolicLink') {
return false
} else {
return true
}
}
})
Users are encouraged to upgrade to the latest patch versions, rather than attempt to sanitize tar input themselves.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | tar | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 3.2.3 | 3.2.3npm install tar@3.2.3 |
| 📦npm | tar | ≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.4.15 | 4.4.15npm install tar@4.4.15 |
| 📦npm | tar | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.0.7 | 5.0.7npm install tar@5.0.7 |
| 📦npm | tar | ≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.1.2 | 6.1.2npm install tar@6.1.2 |
Affected Products
graalvmoraclesinec infrastructure network servicessiemenstartar_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tar, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update tar to 3.2.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r628-mhmh-qjhw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat Quay 3.3 uses an affected version of nodejs-tar. However Quay 3.3 is in extended life phase and a fix will not be delivered[1]. More recent versions of Red Hat Quay do not include nodejs-tar and are not affected. 1. https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhquay Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 8 and…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:12-8040020210817133458.522a0ee4 | RHSA-2021:3623 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | nodejs:14-8040020210817165654.522a0ee4 | RHSA-2021:3666 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Extended Update Support | nodejs:12-8010020210817113128.c27ad7f8 | RHSA-2021:3639 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Extended Update Support | nodejs:12-8020020210817125332.4cda2c84 | RHSA-2021:3638 |
| Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.9.0 on RHEL-8 | odf4/cephcsi-rhel8:4.9-164.57484e3.release_4.9 | RHSA-2021:5086 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-nodejs14-nodejs-0:14.17.5-1.el7 | RHSA-2021:3280 |
| Red Hat Software Collections for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | rh-nodejs12-nodejs-0:12.22.5-1.el7 | RHSA-2021:3281 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-r628-mhmh-qjhw in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.