GHSA-qwgh-2vcv-g2f7 — block_buffer
GHSA-qwgh-2vcv-g2f7 is a security vulnerability in block_buffer. A fix is available for block_buffer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
block_buffer: panic corrupts inline buffer position
Real-World Exposure
block_bufferReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A caught panic may leave the cursor position of EagerBuffer or ReadBuffer in a corrupted state; this in turn allows out-of-bounds reads/writes.
Details & PoC
The following two tests fail miri:
#[cfg(miri)]
#[test]
fn eager_digest_blocks_panic_corrupts_inline_position() {
// `EagerBuffer` stores its cursor in the last byte of the internal block.
// When `digest_blocks` completes a previously partial block, it overwrites
// that byte with input data before invoking the caller-provided `compress`
// callback. If the callback panics, safe code can catch the panic and keep
// using the buffer while its cursor byte no longer satisfies the internal
// `pos < block_size` invariant. Under Miri this `get_pos` call reaches the
// `unreachable_unchecked` used for the assumed-valid cursor.
let mut buf = EagerBuffer::<U4>::new(&[1, 2]);
let _ = std::panic::catch_unwind(std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe(|| {
buf.digest_blocks(&[3, 0xff], |_| panic!("simulated compression failure"));
}));
let _ = buf.get_pos();
}
#[cfg(miri)]
#[test]
fn read_buffer_generator_panic_corrupts_inline_position() {
// `ReadBuffer` stores its cursor in `buffer[0]`, but `write_block` gives
// `gen_block` mutable access to the whole internal block before restoring
// `buffer[0]` to a valid cursor. If `gen_block` writes an arbitrary first
// byte and panics, safe code can catch the panic and later observe an
// invalid cursor. Under Miri this `get_pos` call reaches the
// `unreachable_unchecked` used for the assumed-valid cursor.
let mut buf = ReadBuffer::<U4>::default();
let _ = std::panic::catch_unwind(std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe(|| {
buf.write_block(
1,
|block| {
block[0] = 0xff;
panic!("simulated block generation failure");
},
|_| {},
);
}));
let _ = buf.get_pos();
}
They fail on an unreachable_unchecked!() under the invariant for the pos to always be within bounds of the block.
Impact
While the byte that overwrites pos may come from untrusted input and is therefore attacker-controlled, this still relies on the surrounding code catching the panic and carrying on, which should be uncommon in practice.
For this to be exploitable, the attacker also needs a way to trigger a panic here; I have not investigated how feasible that is.
Credits
The issue was discovered by GPT-5.5
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | block_buffer | all versions | 0.12.1cargo update -p block_buffer --precise 0.12.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for block_buffer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update block_buffer to 0.12.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qwgh-2vcv-g2f7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Constrain what reaches the vulnerable code: limit the size and shape of untrusted input, isolate the affected component in a sandboxed or least-privileged process, and enable the platform's memory-safety mitigations (ASLR, stack protector, hardened allocator) so an out-of-bounds access is more likely to fail closed than to be exploitable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-qwgh-2vcv-g2f7 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.