Rack::Sendfile header-based X-Accel-Mapping regex injection enables unauthorized X-Accel-RedirectGHSA-qv7j-4883-hwh7
MEDIUMGHSA-qv7j-4883-hwh7 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-625 vulnerability in rack. A fix is available for rack — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qv7j-4883-hwh7.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
rack💎rack💎rackReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path interpolates the value of the X-Accel-Mapping request header directly into a regular expression when rewriting file paths for X-Accel-Redirect. Because the header value is not escaped, an attacker who can supply X-Accel-Mapping to the backend can inject regex metacharacters and control the generated X-Accel-Redirect response header.
In deployments using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect, this can allow an attacker to cause nginx to serve unintended files from configured internal locations.
Details
Rack::Sendfile#map_accel_path processes header-supplied mappings using logic equivalent to:
mapping.split(',').map(&:strip).each do |m|
internal, external = m.split('=', 2).map(&:strip)
new_path = path.sub(/\A#{internal}/i, external)
return new_path unless path == new_path
end
Here, internal comes from the HTTP_X_ACCEL_MAPPING request header and is inserted directly into a regular expression without escaping. This gives the header value regex semantics rather than treating it as a literal prefix.
As a result, an attacker can supply metacharacters such as .* or capture groups to alter how the path substitution is performed. For example, a mapping such as:
X-Accel-Mapping: .*=/protected/secret.txt
causes the entire source path to match and rewrites the redirect target to a clean attacker-chosen internal path.
This differs from the documented behavior of the header-based mapping path, which is described as a simple substitution. While application-supplied mappings may intentionally support regular expressions, header-supplied mappings should be treated as literal path prefixes.
The issue is only exploitable when untrusted X-Accel-Mapping headers can reach Rack. One realistic case is a reverse proxy configuration that intends to set X-Accel-Mapping itself, but fails to do so on some routes, allowing a client-supplied header to pass through unchanged.
Impact
Applications using Rack::Sendfile with x-accel-redirect may be affected if the backend accepts attacker-controlled X-Accel-Mapping headers.
In affected deployments, an attacker may be able to control the X-Accel-Redirect response header and cause nginx to serve files from internal locations that were not intended to be reachable through the application. This can lead to unauthorized file disclosure.
The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If the proxy always strips or overwrites X-Accel-Mapping, or if the application uses explicit configured mappings instead of the request header, exploitability may be eliminated.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that treats header-supplied
X-Accel-Mappingvalues as literal strings rather than regular expressions. - Strip or overwrite inbound
X-Accel-Mappingheaders at the reverse proxy so client-supplied values never reach Rack. - Prefer explicit application-configured sendfile mappings instead of relying on request-header mappings.
- Review proxy sub-locations and inherited header settings to ensure
X-Accel-Mappingis consistently set on all backend routes.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | rack | all versions | 2.2.23bundle update rack --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | rack | ≥ 3.0.0.beta1&&< 3.1.21 | 3.1.21bundle update rack --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | rack | ≥ 3.2.0&&< 3.2.6 | 3.2.6bundle update rack --conservative |
Affected Products
rackrackDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rack, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update rack to 2.2.23 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qv7j-4883-hwh7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-qv7j-4883-hwh7 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-qv7j-4883-hwh7 in your dependencies?
Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.