Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj @pdfme/schemas

MEDIUM

GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) vulnerability in @pdfme/schemas. A fix is available for @pdfme/schemas — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via Select Schema Option Value Injection in @pdfme/schemas

Also known asCVE-2026-82867
Published
Mar 18, 2026
Updated
Sep 1, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs8th percentile — riskier than 8% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

7other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@pdfme/schemasnpm
129Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The Select schema plugin in @pdfme/schemas constructs HTML from template-defined option values using unsanitized string interpolation and sets it via innerHTML, enabling arbitrary JavaScript execution.

Details

In packages/schemas/src/select/index.ts, lines 159-164, the Select schema's ui renderer builds <option> elements by directly interpolating option values from the template into an HTML string:

const options = Array.isArray(schema.options) ? schema.options : [];
selectElement.innerHTML = options
  .map(
    (option) =>
      `<option value="${option}" ${option === value ? 'selected' : ''}>${option}</option>`,
  )
  .join('');

The option values come from schema.options, which is an array of strings defined in the template JSON. These values are interpolated directly into the HTML string without any escaping of <, >, ", &, or other HTML-special characters. An option value containing "> breaks out of the value attribute and allows injection of arbitrary HTML elements and event handlers.

Proof of Concept

Loading the following template into a pdfme Form or Designer component triggers JavaScript execution:

{
  "basePdf": { "width": 210, "height": 297, "padding": [20, 20, 20, 20] },
  "schemas": [[
    {
      "name": "malicious_select",
      "type": "select",
      "content": "Normal",
      "options": [
        "Normal",
        "\"></option><img src=x onerror=\"alert(document.domain)\">"
      ],
      "position": { "x": 20, "y": 20 },
      "width": 80,
      "height": 10
    }
  ]]
}

The injected <img onerror> element executes JavaScript because it is parsed as HTML when assigned to selectElement.innerHTML.

Attack Vectors

The options array is defined in the template (not by form-filling end users). The attack requires a malicious template to be loaded, which can happen via:

  1. File upload (e.g., "Load Template" functionality in applications)
  2. Shared/imported templates in multi-tenant applications
  3. Templates stored in databases without content sanitization
  4. The updateTemplate() API being called with untrusted data

This vulnerability is triggered in Form mode (for non-readOnly select fields) and Designer mode when the select element is rendered.

Impact

An attacker who can supply a malicious template can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any user who views or interacts with the template. This enables:

  • Session hijacking via cookie/token theft
  • Keylogging of form input data
  • Phishing and page modification
  • Data exfiltration

Suggested Fix

Use DOM APIs to create option elements safely instead of string interpolation:

options.forEach((option) => {
  const optionEl = document.createElement('option');
  optionEl.value = option;
  optionEl.textContent = option;
  if (option === value) optionEl.selected = true;
  selectElement.appendChild(optionEl);
});

Alternatively, HTML-encode option values before interpolation:

const escape = (s) => s.replace(/&/g, '&amp;').replace(/"/g, '&quot;').replace(/</g, '&lt;').replace(/>/g, '&gt;');

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@pdfme/schemasall versions5.5.9npm install @pdfme/schemas@5.5.9

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @pdfme/schemas, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @pdfme/schemas to 5.5.9 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The Select schema plugin in `@pdfme/schemas` constructs HTML from template-defined option values using unsanitized string interpolation and sets it via `innerHTML`, enabling arbitrary JavaScript execution. ## Details In `packages/schemas/src/select/index.ts`, lines 159-164, the Select schema's `ui` renderer builds `<option>` elements by directly interpolating option values from the template into an HTML string: ```typescript const options = Array.isArray(schema.options) ? schema.options : []; selectElement.innerHTML = options .map( (option) => `<option value="${optio
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-qq9g-96v4-m3cj across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.