Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-qp4c-xg64-7c6x

@backstage/plugin-auth-backend: SSRF in experimental CIMD metadata fetch

Also known asCVE-2026-32236
Published
Mar 12, 2026
Updated
Apr 15, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk21th percentile+0.24%
0.00%0.26%0.53%0.79%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.3%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
📦@backstage/plugin-auth-backend

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in @backstage/plugin-auth-backend when auth.experimentalClientIdMetadataDocuments.enabled is set to true. The CIMD metadata fetch validates the initial client_id hostname against private IP ranges but does not apply the same validation after HTTP redirects.

The practical impact is limited. The attacker cannot read the response body from the internal request, cannot control request headers or method, and the feature must be explicitly enabled via an experimental flag that is off by default. Deployments that restrict allowedClientIdPatterns to specific trusted domains are not affected.

Patches

Patched in @backstage/plugin-auth-backend version 0.27.1. The fix disables HTTP redirect following when fetching CIMD metadata documents.

Workarounds

Disable the experimental CIMD feature by removing or setting auth.experimentalClientIdMetadataDocuments.enabled to false in your app-config. This is the default configuration. Alternatively, restrict allowedClientIdPatterns to specific trusted domains rather than using the default wildcard pattern.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@backstage/plugin-auth-backendall versions0.27.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @backstage/plugin-auth-backend. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update @backstage/plugin-auth-backend to 0.27.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qp4c-xg64-7c6x is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qp4c-xg64-7c6x is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-qp4c-xg64-7c6x. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in `@backstage/plugin-auth-backend` when `auth.experimentalClientIdMetadataDocuments.enabled` is set to `true`. The CIMD metadata fetch validates the initial `client_id` hostname against private IP ranges but does not apply the same validation after HTTP redirects. Th
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qp4c-xg64-7c6x in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-qp4c-xg64-7c6x across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.