Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Maven
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3

HIGHFix: spring-ai-community/mcp-security#68

GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.2) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in org.springaicommunity:mcp-client-security. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Spring AI MCP Security: Unvalidated URL Fetching (SSRF)

Also known asCVE-2026-45609
Published
May 18, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs11th percentile — riskier than 11% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
org.springaicommunity:mcp-client-security

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The mcp-security framework fails to implement the mandatory SSRF mitigations outlined in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) security specifications. Specifically, it processes untrusted URLs for OAuth-related discovery and metadata without verifying if the targets are malicious or internal to the network.

This only affects installations with Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) enabled:

spring.ai.mcp.client.authorization.dynamic-client-registration.enabled=true

DCR does not validate URLs exposed by MCP Servers (protected resource metadata URL, authorization server URL) and Authorization Servers (all OAuth2 endpoints).

Workaround

When users need to perform DCR, they may provide their own McpOAuth2ClientManager. Both McpMetadataDiscoveryService and DynamicClientRegistrationService are also affected, if used, users should provide their own subclasses.

Alternatively, users can provide the default implementations of these classes with a RestClient that implements URL filtering through ClientHttpRequestInterceptor.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
Mavenorg.springaicommunity:mcp-client-securityall versions0.1.9

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.springaicommunity:mcp-client-security. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update org.springaicommunity:mcp-client-security to 0.1.9 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The mcp-security framework fails to implement the mandatory SSRF mitigations outlined in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) [security specifications](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/tutorials/security/security_best_practices#mitigation-3). Specifically, it processes untrusted URLs for OAuth-related discovery and metadata without verifying if the targets are malicious or internal to the network. This only affects installations with Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) enabled: ```properties spring.ai.mcp.client.authorization.dynamic-client-registration.enabled=true ``` DCR does
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-qjp4-4jvr-xqg3 across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.